H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jasmine Paolini vs Lesia Tsurenko H2H: 1-0

Jasmine Paolini holds a 1–0 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2023 Monastir semifinal 6-2 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jasmine Paolini
Italy Age 30 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lesia Tsurenko
Ukraine Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jasmine Paolini #30 6-2 4-6 6-2 Lesia Tsurenko #34 Match data Oct 21, 2023* SF Monastir WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jasmine Paolini #21 #4 5,865 2,056 176 138 56.1% 0 2 0 0 1 3
Lesia Tsurenko #386 #23 2,030 1,898 180 202 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jasmine Paolini Lesia Tsurenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0
21 2017 0–2 0.0% #140 1,453 0 0 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0
22 2018 3–5 37.5% #192 1,498 0 0 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0
23 2019 6–9 40.0% #96 1,586 0 0 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,484 0 0
24 2020 4–8 33.3% #96 1,550 0 0 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,505 0 0
25 2021 20–19 51.3% #53 1,769 0 1 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,510 0 0
26 2022 22–20 52.4% #62 1,741 0 1 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,720 0 1
27 2023 25–23 52.1% #30 1,847 0 1 2016 19–20 48.7% #57 1,724 0 2
28 2024 40–19 67.8% #4 1,973 0 2 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,688 0 3
29 2025 40–20 66.7% #8 2,003 0 3 2018 26–19 57.8% #27 1,808 0 4
30 2026 16–13 55.2% #21 1,891 0 3 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,735 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,766 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,746 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,765 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,870 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,697 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jasmine Paolini Lesia Tsurenko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2019 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2020 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2021 17 13 30 56.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 20 12 32 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2023 19 15 34 55.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2024 20 12 32 62.5% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
29 2025 24 14 38 63.2% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2018 20 14 34 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2026 9 7 16 56.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 2019 10 6 16 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 9 15 24 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 104 81 185 56.2% 57 45 102 55.9% 15 12 27 55.6% — 122 127 249 49.0% 34 48 82 41.5% 24 27 51 47.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 293/315 of Jasmine Paolini's and 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jasmine Paolini Lesia Tsurenko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 0.0 0.0 67.3% 54.3% 41.2% 55.6% 16.7% 50.0% 38.6%
21 2017 2/2 0.0 3.0 57.7% 43.8% 38.8% 63.0% 0.0% 40.4% 28.4% 2010 4/4 1.0 3.8 61.0% 59.3% 41.5% 45.5% 53.9% 52.3% 39.6%
22 2018 8/8 0.4 1.6 66.1% 52.3% 45.2% 51.3% 50.3% 50.2% 43.5% 2011 10/10 1.0 4.5 66.1% 57.8% 37.4% 47.0% 48.7% 50.7% 44.4%
23 2019 15/15 0.7 3.2 66.2% 56.5% 45.9% 54.7% 50.4% 52.8% 41.7% 2012 17/19 0.6 6.3 61.4% 56.3% 38.9% 40.3% 55.0% 49.7% 45.7%
24 2020 12/12 0.7 2.9 63.6% 54.1% 41.6% 49.3% 44.2% 49.7% 47.1% 2013 27/29 1.3 5.2 61.6% 59.8% 45.0% 44.2% 53.6% 54.0% 45.8%
25 2021 38/39 0.9 2.5 66.3% 59.5% 45.8% 55.3% 49.1% 54.9% 43.2% 2014 12/12 2.3 5.6 58.7% 59.9% 45.7% 52.5% 41.0% 54.5% 42.5%
26 2022 40/42 0.8 2.3 66.5% 59.5% 46.8% 53.2% 49.7% 55.4% 43.9% 2015 31/39 1.5 4.3 69.1% 63.2% 53.5% 55.0% 49.7% 59.5% 44.8%
27 2023 47/48 0.9 1.8 68.3% 59.0% 48.4% 51.4% 45.2% 55.7% 43.5% 2016 35/39 1.6 5.0 64.8% 60.5% 44.8% 50.5% 53.2% 54.9% 45.5%
28 2024 53/59 1.3 1.8 67.8% 63.6% 47.8% 52.9% 52.6% 58.5% 45.8% 2017 44/46 1.6 4.1 65.6% 61.5% 44.4% 49.1% 52.0% 55.6% 45.4%
29 2025 51/61 1.3 1.5 68.1% 62.2% 49.5% 52.0% 49.2% 57.9% 45.7% 2018 41/45 1.8 4.5 64.4% 61.8% 46.5% 54.0% 47.5% 56.2% 46.0%
30 2026 27/29 1.6 2.0 67.8% 60.6% 49.2% 58.9% 46.2% 56.5% 44.4% 2019 28/28 1.6 3.3 69.7% 59.1% 43.8% 51.0% 54.3% 54.4% 44.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 3/4 1.0 4.0 65.0% 53.6% 42.6% 35.2% 43.8% 50.0% 42.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 16/16 0.0 3.0 65.8% 55.1% 43.1% 45.6% 55.2% 51.2% 49.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 19/21 0.3 3.2 64.4% 53.7% 43.8% 49.8% 49.2% 49.9% 45.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 37/40 0.1 3.1 66.2% 57.5% 43.0% 47.8% 54.7% 52.7% 50.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 28/30 0.2 4.9 63.5% 55.1% 40.2% 47.0% 46.8% 49.5% 43.7%
Career — 293/315 1.1 2.0 67.2% 60.1% 47.4% 53.4% 48.5% 55.9% 44.3% — 353/383 1.1 4.3 65.1% 59.1% 44.4% 49.2% 51.1% 53.9% 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jasmine Paolini Lesia Tsurenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2016 1484 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1483 96.1 -0.16 -0.74 0.771 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.15
21 2017 1454 95.0 -0.81 -0.44 0.476 36.0% — — — 0.0% -5.25 — — — -0.39 2010 1468 101.2 -1.44 -1.76 0.831 46.3% — +62 — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.08
22 2018 1499 110.7 -1.60 -1.28 0.874 47.0% — +21 — 37.5% -0.88 — 1–1 — +0.11 2011 1468 104.4 -3.16 -0.61 0.900 47.5% +23 +64 — 23.5% -1.41 1–0 0–2 — -0.34
23 2019 1587 114.9 -2.75 -0.55 0.884 47.2% -71 +39 — 37.1% -1.12 4–1 (80%) 1–1 — -0.63 2012 1485 109.3 -4.45 +0.03 0.909 47.7% 0 +73 — 40.9% -0.71 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.05
24 2020 1550 117.8 -2.87 +2.21 0.937 48.4% -99 +114 — 33.3% -0.85 2–1 (67%) — — -0.53 2013 1505 119.0 -1.69 +1.15 0.995 49.9% +10 -7 +46 40.6% -0.36 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 +0.31
25 2021 1770 130.2 -1.17 -0.08 0.958 49.4% -55 -35 — 47.8% -0.30 9–5 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 110.2 -0.03 2014 1510 105.5 -1.40 -0.49 0.933 48.6% -11 — — 36.7% -0.70 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 +0.32
26 2022 1742 131.6 -1.55 +0.45 0.984 49.9% -12 +2 — 50.5% +0.13 11–10 (52%) 2–7 (22%) 98.4 -0.51 2015 1721 139.7 +1.11 +2.63 1.105 52.2% +8 — -177 59.3% +0.80 5–6 (45%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 +0.25
27 2023 1848 138.9 -0.40 +0.93 0.981 49.6% -23 -12 -324 47.7% -0.21 10–5 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 106.5 -1.68 2016 1725 125.5 -0.94 +1.32 1.009 50.2% +25 -190 -217 50.6% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 3–6 (33%) 103.6 +1.38
28 2024 1973 157.6 +2.06 +3.44 1.105 52.2% -50 -13 -140 63.3% +0.79 9–9 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 105.7 +0.64 2017 1689 134.1 -0.08 +2.63 1.024 50.6% +20 -134 -107 47.9% -0.10 5–7 (42%) 7–6 (54%) 100.9 -1.57
29 2025 2004 161.4 +1.61 +2.90 1.085 52.0% -5 +75 -162 62.5% +0.68 11–5 (69%) 8–5 (62%) 106.8 +1.91 2018 1808 142.9 -0.18 +2.84 1.051 51.2% +2 -219 -158 60.4% +0.77 8–3 (73%) 5–3 (63%) 106.6 +0.69
30 2026 1891 138.3 -0.19 +0.80 1.021 50.6% +23 +89 +18 50.7% +0.16 9–4 (69%) 1–5 (17%) 99.0 +2.54 2019 1736 136.2 -1.34 +1.80 0.981 49.5% +99 -130 -117 46.6% -0.22 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -0.24
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1767 118.5 +0.32 +2.54 0.856 46.8% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.91
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1746 128.4 -2.98 +2.74 1.009 50.1% +22 — — 43.8% -0.44 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.04
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1766 127.9 -3.73 +2.57 0.901 47.5% -41 -82 -3 57.5% +0.18 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 -1.59
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1870 139.4 -2.54 +6.34 1.063 51.5% -23 -32 -93 62.0% +0.68 7–2 (78%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -1.77
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1697 119.9 -5.55 +0.83 0.866 46.6% +16 +33 — 41.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — +0.10
Career — 2056 144.8 -0.10 +1.43 1.005 50.3% -26 +27 -129 52.4% +0.10 65–40 (62%) 33–28 (54%) 112.0 +0.46 — 1898 136.0 -1.67 +2.21 0.991 49.8% +13 -65 -90 49.5% -0.03 56–47 (54%) 36–36 (50%) 105.0 -0.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.