H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Mirra Andreeva H2H: 1-2
Mirra Andreeva holds a 2–1 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Mirra Andreeva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mirra Andreeva won the 2024 Cincinnati fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 19
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2024* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Mirra Andreeva | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Jun 8, 2024* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Jasmine Paolini | 6-3 6-1 | Mirra Andreeva | Match data |
| May 1, 2024* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Mirra Andreeva | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Mirra Andreeva | #5 | #5 | 5,751 | 2,131 | 125 | 51 | 71.0% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Mirra Andreeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #57 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #16 | 1,942 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #9 | 1,934 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 37–11 | 77.1% | #5 | 2,059 | 1 | 6 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |