H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:17 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Taylor Townsend H2H: 1-0
Jasmine Paolini holds a 1–0 lead over Taylor Townsend in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2026 Miami second round 6-3 1-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 30
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026 | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 6-3 1-6 6-2 | Taylor Townsend | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Taylor Townsend | #80 | #46 | 1,267 | 1,859 | 68 | 85 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Taylor Townsend | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #365 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #309 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #135 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #94 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #81 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #89 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #81 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #117 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |