H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jelena Dokic vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 1-3

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 3–1 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Amélie Mauresmo leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2009 Brisbane International first round 7-6(9) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Dokic
AUS Age 43 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #23 7-6(9) 7-6(5) Jelena Dokic #177 Match data Jan 7, 2009* R32 Brisbane International International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #7 7-5 6-2 Jelena Dokic #10 Match data May 3, 2003* SF Warsaw Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Jelena Dokic #23 7-6(3) 6-1 Amélie Mauresmo #6 Match data May 20, 2001* F Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #16 6-1 6-4 Jelena Dokic #27 Match data Oct 24, 2000* R32 Moscow Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jelena Dokic #945 #4 3,338 2,033 212 177 54.5% 0 2 0 1 3 6
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Dokic Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1998 0–1 0.0% #349 1,497 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 1999 11–10 52.4% #43 1,611 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2000 32–21 60.4% #24 1,784 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0
18 2001 53–23 69.7% #8 2,002 0 3 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0
19 2002 53–27 66.2% #9 1,899 0 5 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1
20 2003 28–30 48.3% #15 1,778 0 5 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2
21 2004 7–16 30.4% #124 1,572 0 5 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6
22 2005 2–5 28.6% #349 1,517 0 5 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8
23 2006 0–2 0.0% #587 1,491 0 5 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10
24 — — — — — — — 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15
25 2008 1–3 25.0% #179 1,473 0 5 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19
26 2009 6–9 40.0% #56 1,523 0 5 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23
27 2010 1–5 16.7% #138 1,510 0 5 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24
28 2011 15–16 48.4% #66 1,592 0 6 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24
29 2012 3–9 25.0% #258 1,516 0 6 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jelena Dokic Amélie Mauresmo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1999 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 2000 15 13 28 53.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2001 26 11 37 70.3% 16 8 24 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2002 22 13 35 62.9% 20 7 27 74.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
20 2003 15 14 29 51.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2004 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9%
22 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2008 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2010 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2011 8 10 18 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
Career — 103 94 197 52.3% 61 49 110 55.5% 30 17 47 63.8% 18 17 35 51.4% — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 76/151 of Jelena Dokic's and 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jelena Dokic Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 7/58 4.1 8.0 59.4% 70.1% 43.9% 62.0% 39.0% 60.0% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 3/23 2.3 10.3 53.0% 68.8% 31.9% 50.9% 55.0% 51.3% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 1/2 1.0 11.0 59.2% 67.2% 42.5% 63.6% 40.0% 57.1% 41.1% 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1%
25 2008 4/4 1.8 7.0 55.1% 56.4% 27.9% 29.6% 33.0% 43.8% 32.7% 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6%
26 2009 14/15 3.4 7.6 60.2% 66.2% 44.7% 51.6% 53.6% 57.6% 40.1% 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1%
27 2010 6/6 4.0 8.0 48.3% 59.0% 42.7% 56.3% 41.5% 50.6% 36.6% 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7%
28 2011 30/31 4.0 7.6 56.5% 65.5% 41.2% 55.8% 48.2% 55.0% 42.4% 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5%
29 2012 11/12 2.8 8.5 52.4% 68.4% 48.0% 49.7% 48.6% 58.5% 41.0% 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1%
Career — 76/389 3.5 7.9 56.0% 65.6% 42.2% 53.3% 47.2% 55.4% 40.5% — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jelena Dokic Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1998 1497 107.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.27 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12
16 1999 1612 133.7 — — — — -50 -32 +56 50.0% +0.10 5–5 (50%) 0–2 — -0.37 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03
17 2000 1784 148.2 — — — — -86 -71 +45 59.7% +0.69 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) 106.9 -0.05 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06
18 2001 2003 163.4 — — — — -34 -133 -99 66.9% +1.26 11–9 (55%) 7–5 (58%) 101.9 -0.37 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59
19 2002 1899 156.5 — — — — -16 +81 +103 64.7% +0.94 17–8 (68%) 10–4 (71%) 108.9 +0.53 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67
20 2003 1779 142.2 +2.27 +0.61 1.076 51.3% +34 +61 +149 48.5% -0.25 9–11 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 99.5 +1.66 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71
21 2004 1573 109.3 -1.18 -3.35 0.666 42.8% +137 +131 +216 32.1% -1.30 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 95.1 +1.39 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74
22 2005 1517 98.3 — — — — +150 +121 — 42.9% -0.79 0–2 1–1 — +0.38 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13
23 2006 1491 99.0 -1.59 -1.92 0.960 48.8% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–2 — +0.08 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48
25 2008 1474 92.2 -2.56 -3.96 0.581 38.0% — — — 28.6% -1.71 1–0 — — +0.02 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83
26 2009 1523 124.6 +1.93 -1.71 0.946 48.8% +118 +63 — 41.7% -0.33 5–3 (63%) 1–3 (25%) 102.9 -0.16 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85
27 2010 1510 111.3 -2.42 -1.14 0.741 43.8% +104 — — 23.1% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.69 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04
28 2011 1592 124.8 -0.96 -1.42 0.942 48.7% +38 -55 +172 49.3% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–1 (88%) 104.3 -0.32 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52
29 2012 1517 117.2 +0.82 -2.07 0.988 50.0% +50 — — 39.1% -0.30 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.34 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60
Career — 2033 149.9 -0.09 -1.57 0.907 48.0% +6 +1 +68 54.7% +0.30 62–62 (50%) 45–34 (57%) 104.1 +0.56 — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.