H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Elena Bovina H2H: 1-2
Elena Bovina holds a 2–1 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Elena Bovina leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2004 Paris fourth round 4-6 7-6(5) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2004* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Elena Bovina | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-0 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Elena Bovina | 6-3 6-2 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2002* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jelena Dokic | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Elena Bovina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Elena Bovina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |