H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Eleni Daniilidou H2H: 1-1
Jelena Dokic and Eleni Daniilidou are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eleni Daniilidou leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jelena Dokic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Eleni Daniilidou won the 2003 Paris quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GRE
Age 43
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2003* | Paris | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Eleni Daniilidou | 6-1 6-3 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2002* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Jelena Dokic | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Eleni Daniilidou | #1,070 | #14 | 1,639 | 1,878 | 185 | 203 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Eleni Daniilidou | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #34 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #69 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #36 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #100 | 1,483 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #186 | 1,431 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,412 | 0 | 5 |