H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jelena Dokic vs Emmanuelle Gagliardi H2H: 6-0

Jelena Dokic holds a 6–0 lead over Emmanuelle Gagliardi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jelena Dokic leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2003 US Open first round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Dokic
AUS Age 43 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Emmanuelle Gagliardi
SUI Age 50 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 27, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jelena Dokic #23 6-4 6-2 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #61 Match data
Jun 27, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Jelena Dokic #12 6-1 6-3 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #64 Match data
May 29, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Jelena Dokic #9 6-4 6-2 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #44 Match data
Apr 12, 2002* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Jelena Dokic #8 6-3 6-4 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #46 Match data
Oct 12, 2000* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Jelena Dokic #31 6-3 6-0 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #80 Match data
May 6, 1999* Warsaw WTA 250 R32 Clay Jelena Dokic #149 3-6 7-5 6-4 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #72 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jelena Dokic #945 #4 3,338 2,031 208 175 54.3% 0 2 0 1 3 6
Emmanuelle Gagliardi #736 #42 781 1,695 117 182 39.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Dokic Emmanuelle Gagliardi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1998 0–1 0.0% #349 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1999 11–10 52.4% #43 1,629 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 28–19 59.6% #24 1,769 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 53–23 69.7% #8 1,999 0 3 1995 0–3 0.0% #229 1,464 0 0
19 2002 53–27 66.2% #9 1,897 0 5 1996 2–1 66.7% #123 1,504 0 0
20 2003 28–30 48.3% #15 1,778 0 5 1997 7–9 43.8% #78 1,531 0 0
21 2004 7–16 30.4% #124 1,582 0 5 1998 5–12 29.4% #101 1,497 0 0
22 2005 2–5 28.6% #349 1,525 0 5 1999 11–14 44.0% #68 1,563 0 0
23 2006 0–2 0.0% #587 1,499 0 5 2000 12–19 38.7% #95 1,550 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2001 10–17 37.0% #69 1,548 0 0
25 2008 1–3 25.0% #179 1,480 0 5 2002 19–23 45.2% #61 1,583 0 0
26 2009 6–9 40.0% #56 1,527 0 5 2003 25–23 52.1% #56 1,608 0 0
27 2010 1–5 16.7% #138 1,513 0 5 2004 8–18 30.8% #105 1,524 0 0
28 2011 15–16 48.4% #66 1,592 0 6 2005 10–15 40.0% #95 1,505 0 0
29 2012 3–9 25.0% #258 1,516 0 6 2006 7–17 29.2% #115 1,470 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2007 1–10 9.1% #131 1,409 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #261 1,401 0 0