H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jelena Dokic vs Justine Henin H2H: 1-2

Justine Henin holds a 2–1 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Justine Henin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2003 Zurich final 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Dokic
AUS Age 43 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Justine Henin
BEL Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Justine Henin #2 6-0 6-4 Jelena Dokic #25 Match data Oct 19, 2003* F Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Jelena Dokic #9 7-6(3) 7-6(3) Justine Henin #8 Match data May 5, 2002* QF Hamburg Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Justine Henin #9 6-2 4-1 (ret.) Jelena Dokic #8 Match data Apr 13, 2002* SF Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jelena Dokic #945 #4 3,338 2,033 212 177 54.5% 0 0 2 0 1 3 6
Justine Henin #13 #1 7,626 2,393 448 102 81.5% 7 1 10 2 18 5 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Dokic Justine Henin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1998 0–1 0.0% #349 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1999 11–10 52.4% #43 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 32–21 60.4% #24 1,784 0 0 1999 11–6 64.7% #69 1,655 0 1
18 2001 53–23 69.7% #8 2,002 0 3 2000 17–13 56.7% #45 1,749 0 1
19 2002 53–27 66.2% #9 1,899 0 5 2001 56–18 75.7% #7 1,984 0 4
20 2003 28–30 48.3% #15 1,778 0 5 2002 50–21 70.4% #5 2,003 0 6
21 2004 7–16 30.4% #124 1,572 0 5 2003 73–11 86.9% #1 2,211 2 14
22 2005 2–5 28.6% #349 1,517 0 5 2004 36–4 90.0% #8 2,222 3 19
23 2006 0–2 0.0% #587 1,491 0 5 2005 34–5 87.2% #6 2,214 4 23
24 — — — — — — — 2006 57–8 87.7% #1 2,287 5 29
25 2008 1–3 25.0% #179 1,473 0 5 2007 63–4 94.0% #1 2,383 7 39
26 2009 6–9 40.0% #56 1,523 0 5 2008 17–4 81.0% #1 2,287 7 41
27 2010 1–5 16.7% #138 1,510 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 2011 15–16 48.4% #66 1,592 0 6 2010 32–7 82.1% #12 2,206 7 43
29 2012 3–9 25.0% #258 1,516 0 6 2011 2–1 66.7% #13 2,181 7 43

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jelena Dokic Justine Henin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1999 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 15 13 28 53.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 2 2 4 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
18 2001 26 11 37 70.3% 16 8 24 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2002 22 13 35 62.9% 20 7 27 74.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2001 31 11 42 73.8% 14 4 18 77.8% 10 1 11 90.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2003 15 14 29 51.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2002 23 12 35 65.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 2004 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 40 6 46 87.0% 20 1 21 95.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
22 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 32 2 34 94.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
23 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 10 4 14 71.4% 24 0 24 100.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 33 5 38 86.8% 14 2 16 87.5% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — —
25 2008 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 38 1 39 97.4% 14 1 15 93.3% 9 1 10 90.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 16 3 19 84.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2010 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 8 10 18 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2010 16 4 20 80.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
29 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 94 197 52.3% 61 49 110 55.5% 30 17 47 63.8% 18 17 35 51.4% — 254 58 312 81.4% 122 21 143 85.3% 53 11 64 82.8% 19 12 31 61.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 76/151 of Jelena Dokic's and 228/358 of Justine Henin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jelena Dokic Justine Henin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 7/58 4.1 8.0 59.4% 70.1% 43.9% 62.0% 39.0% 60.0% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 3/23 2.3 10.3 53.0% 68.8% 31.9% 50.9% 55.0% 51.3% 32.5% 2003 20/84 2.5 3.4 53.3% 73.0% 53.7% 58.7% 56.5% 63.9% 51.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 13/40 3.0 5.3 50.1% 69.4% 51.2% 59.1% 54.8% 60.1% 51.6%
23 2006 1/2 1.0 11.0 59.2% 67.2% 42.5% 63.6% 40.0% 57.1% 41.1% 2005 16/39 2.2 6.5 50.6% 71.0% 42.7% 61.1% 54.0% 56.9% 52.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 56/65 2.5 4.0 56.8% 71.5% 52.9% 51.3% 54.5% 63.4% 53.1%
25 2008 4/4 1.8 7.0 55.1% 56.4% 27.9% 29.6% 33.0% 43.8% 32.7% 2007 64/67 3.1 4.0 55.3% 72.7% 52.5% 57.6% 54.0% 63.7% 50.9%
26 2009 14/15 3.4 7.6 60.2% 66.2% 44.7% 51.6% 53.6% 57.6% 40.1% 2008 18/21 3.2 4.8 50.9% 69.9% 48.1% 63.5% 48.4% 59.0% 47.9%
27 2010 6/6 4.0 8.0 48.3% 59.0% 42.7% 56.3% 41.5% 50.6% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 30/31 4.0 7.6 56.5% 65.5% 41.2% 55.8% 48.2% 55.0% 42.4% 2010 38/39 3.7 4.9 55.6% 71.7% 51.6% 54.2% 53.7% 62.9% 47.0%
29 2012 11/12 2.8 8.5 52.4% 68.4% 48.0% 49.7% 48.6% 58.5% 41.0% 2011 3/3 4.0 5.3 54.4% 72.4% 51.9% 63.3% 48.1% 63.3% 46.6%
Career — 76/389 3.5 7.9 56.0% 65.6% 42.2% 53.3% 47.2% 55.4% 40.5% — 228/550 2.9 4.4 54.6% 71.7% 51.4% 56.4% 53.8% 62.5% 50.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jelena Dokic Justine Henin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1998 1497 107.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1999 1612 133.7 — — — — -50 -32 +56 50.0% +0.10 5–5 (50%) 0–2 — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1784 148.2 — — — — -86 -71 +45 59.7% +0.69 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) 106.9 -0.05 1999 1655 135.1 — — — — -44 -20 — 64.1% +1.38 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.55
18 2001 2003 163.4 — — — — -34 -133 -99 66.9% +1.26 11–9 (55%) 7–5 (58%) 101.9 -0.37 2000 1749 144.4 — — — — -25 -104 -162 59.1% +0.74 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -1.83
19 2002 1899 156.5 — — — — -16 +81 +103 64.7% +0.94 17–8 (68%) 10–4 (71%) 108.9 +0.53 2001 1984 161.8 — — — — -70 -139 -32 73.7% +1.68 12–11 (52%) 8–9 (47%) 100.5 -2.53
20 2003 1779 142.2 +2.27 +0.61 1.076 51.3% +34 +61 +149 48.5% -0.25 9–11 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 99.5 +1.66 2002 2004 159.7 — — — — -54 -47 +40 66.5% +1.01 11–9 (55%) 14–11 (56%) 98.9 -1.42
21 2004 1573 109.3 -1.18 -3.35 0.666 42.8% +137 +131 +216 32.1% -1.30 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 95.1 +1.39 2003 2211 171.2 +6.75 +6.21 1.432 57.6% -57 -5 -130 80.4% +2.15 16–4 (80%) 8–3 (73%) 110.8 -2.83
22 2005 1517 98.3 — — — — +150 +121 — 42.9% -0.79 0–2 1–1 — +0.38 2004 2223 165.8 +3.52 +5.52 1.296 55.6% +14 -53 — 84.7% +2.27 5–2 (71%) 4–0 (100%) 104.0 -0.39
23 2006 1491 99.0 -1.59 -1.92 0.960 48.8% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–2 — +0.08 2005 2215 154.4 +1.66 +6.12 1.214 54.5% -50 +146 — 75.6% +1.76 12–2 (86%) 5–1 (83%) 107.2 -1.31
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2288 172.1 +7.32 +9.10 1.453 57.9% -24 +29 -105 83.9% +2.57 8–5 (62%) 6–2 (75%) 101.8 -3.18
25 2008 1474 92.2 -2.56 -3.96 0.581 38.0% — — — 28.6% -1.71 1–0 — — +0.02 2007 2384 173.7 +7.78 +7.96 1.402 56.9% +1 +34 -126 85.4% +2.48 14–3 (82%) 11–3 (79%) 107.3 -1.25
26 2009 1523 124.6 +1.93 -1.71 0.946 48.8% +118 +63 — 41.7% -0.33 5–3 (63%) 1–3 (25%) 102.9 -0.16 2008 2287 147.8 +2.60 +2.75 1.166 53.4% +23 — — 71.7% +1.61 5–1 (83%) 0–4 (0%) 95.1 +0.11
27 2010 1510 111.3 -2.42 -1.14 0.741 43.8% +104 — — 23.1% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 1592 124.8 -0.96 -1.42 0.942 48.7% +38 -55 +172 49.3% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–1 (88%) 104.3 -0.32 2010 2207 159.2 +6.24 +4.44 1.266 54.5% +37 +55 +20 76.3% +1.49 8–7 (53%) 7–3 (70%) 96.9 -1.91
29 2012 1517 117.2 +0.82 -2.07 0.988 50.0% +50 — — 39.1% -0.30 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.34 2011 2181 117.1 +2.80 +0.16 1.268 54.6% +36 — — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 0–1 — -0.01
Career — 2033 149.9 -0.09 -1.57 0.907 48.0% +6 +1 +68 54.7% +0.30 62–62 (50%) 45–34 (57%) 104.1 +0.56 — 2394 169.9 +6.17 +6.72 1.351 56.2% -27 +4 -64 76.2% +1.83 97–54 (64%) 68–42 (62%) 107.0 -3.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.