H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Kveta Peschke H2H: 2-1
Jelena Dokic holds a 2–1 lead over Kveta Peschke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Jelena Dokic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2002 Wimbledon second round 6-0 4-6 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Jelena Dokic | 6-0 4-6 8-6 | Kveta Peschke | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2001* | Sopot | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Jelena Dokic | 6-3 6-2 | Kveta Peschke | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Kveta Peschke | 6-3 6-1 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Kveta Peschke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |