H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Jelena Jankovic vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 1-6

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 6–1 lead over Jelena Jankovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2009 Paris semifinal 6-2 0-6 6-1.

SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 6
7 main draw meetings
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 14, 2009* Paris WTA 500 SF Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #24 6-2 0-6 6-1 Jelena Jankovic #3 Match data
Feb 24, 2007* Dubai WTA 500 SF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-2 0-0 (ret.) Jelena Jankovic #11 Match data
Jan 13, 2007* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Jelena Jankovic #12 7-5 6-0 Amélie Mauresmo #3 Match data
Sep 23, 2006* Beijing WTA 500 SF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #1 6-1 3-6 7-6(3) Jelena Jankovic #17 Match data
Jun 3, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #1 6-3 6-3 Jelena Jankovic #32 Match data
Oct 7, 2005* Filderstadt WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #4 6-0 (ret.) Jelena Jankovic #17 Match data
Oct 30, 2004* Linz WTA 500 SF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 4-6 6-3 6-1 Jelena Jankovic #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,132 547 332 62.2% 0 6 0 3 6 15
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Jankovic Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,528 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
18 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,505 0 0 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
19 2004 27–25 51.9% #28 1,754 0 1 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,732 0 1 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,915 0 1 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,966 0 5 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 2008 63–18 77.8% #1 2,087 0 9 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,948 0 11 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,794 0 12 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,804 0 12 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 2012 31–27 53.4% #22 1,737 0 12 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,918 0 13 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,795 0 13 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25
30 2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,851 0 15
31 2016 21–19 52.5% #54 1,738 0 15
32 2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,576 0 15