H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jelena Jankovic vs Anna Tatishvili H2H: 2-0
Jelena Jankovic holds a 2–0 lead over Anna Tatishvili in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jelena Jankovic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2015 Luxembourg fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2015* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-4 6-2 | Anna Tatishvili | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2013 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 7-6(6) 4-6 6-3 | Anna Tatishvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
| Anna Tatishvili | #1,071 | #50 | 1,210 | 1,608 | 43 | 92 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Jankovic | Anna Tatishvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #302 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #285 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #51 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 | 2013 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #101 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #200 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #516 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |