H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Ekaterina Ivanova holds a 1–0 lead over Jelena Jankovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ekaterina Ivanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Ivanova won the 2011 Moscow round of 32 6-4 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Ivanova | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data | Oct 20, 2011* | R32 | Moscow | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,138 | 552 | 337 | 62.1% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 15 |
| Ekaterina Ivanova | #1,270 | #136 | 464 | 1,513 | 10 | 16 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jelena Jankovic | Ekaterina Ivanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #141 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #28 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #1 | 2,091 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,797 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,920 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,797 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,575 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Jelena Jankovic | Ekaterina Ivanova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2001 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 17 | 19 | 36 | 47.2% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2010 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 22 | 18 | 40 | 55.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2011 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 31 | 17 | 48 | 64.6% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 38 | 18 | 56 | 67.9% | 23 | 5 | 28 | 82.1% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 49 | 15 | 64 | 76.6% | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 22 | 12 | 34 | 64.7% | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 17 | 16 | 33 | 51.5% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 27 | 15 | 42 | 64.3% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 26 | 18 | 44 | 59.1% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 21 | 6 | 27 | 77.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | 14 | 36 | 61.1% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 26 | 14 | 40 | 65.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 56.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 348 | 225 | 573 | 60.7% | 146 | 73 | 219 | 66.7% | 53 | 32 | 85 | 62.4% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | Career | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Jelena Jankovic | Ekaterina Ivanova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2001 | 1512 | 104.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.40 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.03 | 2007 | 1493 | 96.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.71 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.07 |
| 2002 | 1529 | 120.6 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | — | 35.7% | -0.79 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.14 | 2008 | 1493 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | 38.5% | -1.08 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | +0.24 |
| 2003 | 1488 | 112.5 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -9 | — | 39.3% | -0.36 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–2 | — | +0.62 | 2009 | 1492 | 100.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | 45.5% | -0.64 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.25 |
| 2004 | 1746 | 139.9 | -1.12 | +2.19 | 0.989 | 49.7% | -43 | -137 | -129 | 53.7% | +0.12 | 8–11 (42%) | 11–2 (85%) | 107.5 | -0.93 | 2010 | 1474 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | — | 40.9% | -1.23 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–0 | — | +0.71 |
| 2005 | 1733 | 142.6 | +1.39 | +0.98 | 1.067 | 51.2% | -36 | -21 | -3 | 56.8% | +0.58 | 9–15 (38%) | 3–6 (33%) | 91.2 | -0.92 | 2011 | 1504 | 108.0 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.20 | 2–0 | — | — | +0.05 |
| 2006 | 1925 | 155.2 | +0.93 | +2.16 | 1.062 | 51.3% | -25 | -178 | -93 | 62.0% | +0.98 | 16–10 (62%) | 8–9 (47%) | 105.8 | -1.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 1977 | 166.7 | +4.61 | +7.29 | 1.259 | 54.9% | -66 | +125 | -9 | 71.8% | +1.76 | 15–14 (52%) | 9–8 (53%) | 99.5 | -2.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 2091 | 167.1 | +4.57 | +5.72 | 1.211 | 54.2% | 0 | +6 | -122 | 72.3% | +1.59 | 14–12 (54%) | 9–6 (60%) | 97.6 | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1953 | 153.9 | +3.33 | +4.18 | 1.158 | 53.2% | +35 | +106 | -56 | 65.7% | +0.99 | 10–10 (50%) | 13–6 (68%) | 96.3 | +1.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1797 | 148.2 | +1.63 | +4.10 | 1.111 | 52.3% | -26 | +268 | +127 | 59.5% | +0.69 | 11–5 (69%) | 6–6 (50%) | 98.9 | +1.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1795 | 152.5 | +3.98 | +4.60 | 1.215 | 54.2% | -5 | +179 | — | 63.5% | +1.32 | 6–15 (29%) | 3–2 (60%) | 89.2 | +2.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1733 | 140.2 | +0.76 | +2.74 | 1.061 | 51.2% | +44 | +108 | +82 | 51.6% | +0.25 | 6–10 (38%) | 8–11 (42%) | 90.7 | -0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1921 | 155.5 | +1.91 | +3.65 | 1.103 | 52.2% | -10 | +25 | — | 63.4% | +0.98 | 17–10 (63%) | 12–6 (67%) | 108.0 | +2.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 1797 | 152.0 | +3.44 | +3.23 | 1.165 | 53.1% | +32 | +152 | — | 63.1% | +1.09 | 6–8 (43%) | 5–9 (36%) | 91.3 | +1.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1858 | 140.4 | +1.72 | +0.71 | 1.039 | 50.5% | +8 | +11 | -27 | 61.7% | +0.75 | 15–6 (71%) | 7–5 (58%) | 106.0 | +0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 1730 | 132.2 | +1.48 | +2.78 | 1.125 | 52.4% | +42 | +35 | +71 | 56.0% | +0.52 | 4–12 (25%) | 4–5 (44%) | 86.5 | +1.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1575 | 121.7 | -1.62 | -1.81 | 0.871 | 47.5% | +83 | +113 | +164 | 34.4% | -0.87 | 2–9 (18%) | 1–4 (20%) | 88.8 | -0.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2139 | 156.2 | +2.59 | +3.80 | 1.133 | 52.7% | -3 | +72 | -8 | 61.1% | +0.87 | 142–153 (48%) | 101–88 (53%) | 93.6 | +0.58 | Career | 1514 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | +41 | +34 | — | 39.7% | -1.14 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.6 | +5.08 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venus Williams | 7 | 7 | 14 | Mar 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Serena Williams | 4 | 10 | 14 | Aug 16, 2014 | H2H |
| Alona Bondarenko | 13 | 1 | 14 | May 24, 2011 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 6 | 8 | 14 | Feb 26, 2011 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 6 | 7 | 13 | Jan 22, 2017 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Vesnina | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 21, 2011 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 1 | 0 | 1 | Oct 20, 2011 | H2H |
| Marion Bartoli | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 4, 2011 | H2H |
| Nina Bratchikova | 1 | 0 | 1 | Mar 3, 2011 | H2H |
| Monica Niculescu | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 24, 2010 | H2H |