H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jelena Jankovic vs Kaia Kanepi H2H: 3-4

Kaia Kanepi holds a 4–3 lead over Jelena Jankovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Kaia Kanepi leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Jelena Jankovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kaia Kanepi won the 2014 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Jankovic
SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Kaia Kanepi
EST Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 25, 2014* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Kaia Kanepi #42 6-3 6-2 Jelena Jankovic #8 Match data
Apr 14, 2012* Copenhagen WTA 250 QF Hard Jelena Jankovic #20 4-6 6-1 6-3 Kaia Kanepi #34 Match data
Feb 18, 2011* Dubai WTA 1000 R16 Hard Jelena Jankovic #8 2-6 6-3 7-5 Kaia Kanepi #16 Match data
Oct 1, 2010* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Hard Kaia Kanepi #25 6-4 6-4 Jelena Jankovic #6 Match data
Sep 5, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Kaia Kanepi #32 6-2 7-6(1) Jelena Jankovic #5 Match data
May 26, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Jelena Jankovic #4 6-2 3-6 6-4 Kaia Kanepi #118 Match data
Feb 20, 2009* Dubai WTA 1000 R16 Hard Kaia Kanepi #24 6-2 7-5 Jelena Jankovic #3 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,132 547 332 62.2% 0 6 0 3 6 15
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,912 261 235 52.6% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Jankovic Kaia Kanepi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,528 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
18 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 27–25 51.9% #28 1,754 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,732 0 1 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,538 0 0
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,915 0 1 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,610 0 0
22 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,966 0 5 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,583 0 0
23 2008 63–18 77.8% #1 2,087 0 9 2008 28–20 58.3% #27 1,747 0 0
24 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,948 0 11 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,598 0 0
25 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,794 0 12 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,839 0 1
26 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,804 0 12 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,816 0 1
27 2012 31–27 53.4% #22 1,737 0 12 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,868 0 3
28 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,918 0 13 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,841 0 4
29 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,795 0 13 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,718 0 4
30 2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,851 0 15 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,649 0 4
31 2016 21–19 52.5% #54 1,738 0 15 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,655 0 4
32 2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,576 0 15 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,725 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2018 11–11 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2019 9–10 47.4% #101 1,748 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,719 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,703 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,801 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2023 6–16 27.3% #168 1,607 0 4