H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Jelena Jankovic vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 5-3

Jelena Jankovic holds a 5–3 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Jelena Jankovic leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2016 Brisbane third round 3-6 6-2 6-4.

SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 6, 2016* Brisbane WTA 500 R32 Hard Roberta Vinci #15 3-6 6-2 6-4 Jelena Jankovic #21 Match data
Aug 17, 2013* Cincinnati WTA 1000 QF Hard Jelena Jankovic #15 6-0 6-4 Roberta Vinci #12 Match data
Mar 23, 2013* Miami WTA 1000 QF Hard Jelena Jankovic #24 6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 Roberta Vinci #15 Match data
Jan 11, 2013* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Roberta Vinci #16 3-6 6-4 7-6(4) Jelena Jankovic #22 Match data
Aug 26, 2012* Dallas WTA 250 F Hard Roberta Vinci #23 7-5 6-3 Jelena Jankovic #34 Match data
Sep 2, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jelena Jankovic #5 6-2 6-3 Roberta Vinci #45 Match data
Apr 11, 2009* Marbella WTA 250 QF Clay Jelena Jankovic #4 3-6 6-3 7-6(6) Roberta Vinci #67 Match data
Apr 30, 2004* Budapest WTA 250 R16 Clay Jelena Jankovic #59 6-2 1-6 7-6(5) Roberta Vinci #119 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,132 547 332 62.2% 0 6 0 3 6 15
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Jankovic Roberta Vinci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0
17 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,528 0 0
18 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,505 0 0 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0
19 2004 27–25 51.9% #28 1,754 0 1 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0
20 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,732 0 1 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,915 0 1 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0
22 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,966 0 5 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0
23 2008 63–18 77.8% #1 2,087 0 9 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0
24 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,948 0 11 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1
25 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,794 0 12 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1
26 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,804 0 12 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2
27 2012 31–27 53.4% #22 1,737 0 12 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3
28 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,918 0 13 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6
29 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,795 0 13 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7
30 2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,851 0 15 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9
31 2016 21–19 52.5% #54 1,738 0 15 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9
32 2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,576 0 15 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9
33 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10