H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jelena Jankovic vs Sofia Arvidsson H2H: 2-2
Jelena Jankovic and Sofia Arvidsson are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jelena Jankovic leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Sofia Arvidsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sofia Arvidsson won the 2012 's Hertogenbosch third round 6-2 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2012* | 's Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Sofia Arvidsson | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| May 20, 2011* | Brussels | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Sofia Arvidsson | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2008* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-3 6-7(5) 7-5 | Sofia Arvidsson | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2008* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-7(7) 6-2 7-6(9) | Sofia Arvidsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
| Sofia Arvidsson | #320 | #29 | 1,380 | 1,775 | 113 | 154 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Jankovic | Sofia Arvidsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #67 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #98 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 | 2009 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 | 2010 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 | 2011 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #78 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 | 2012 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #41 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 | 2013 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #120 | 1,597 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #320 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |