H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jelena Jankovic vs Zi Yan H2H: 0-2
Zi Yan holds a 2–0 lead over Jelena Jankovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zi Yan leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zi Yan won the 2008 Bangalore quarterfinal 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
HKG
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2008* | Bangalore | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Zi Yan | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| Oct 11, 2007* | Bangkok | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Zi Yan | 4-6 7-6(5) (ret.) | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
| Zi Yan | #789 | #40 | 678 | 1,634 | 34 | 57 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jelena Jankovic | Zi Yan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #166 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |