H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jelena Kostanic Tosic vs Iroda Tulyaganova H2H: 1-1
Jelena Kostanic Tosic and Iroda Tulyaganova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jelena Kostanic Tosic leads 1–0 on clay, while Iroda Tulyaganova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Kostanic Tosic won the 2003 Sopot third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 45
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 44
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2003* | Sopot | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | 6-2 6-2 | Iroda Tulyaganova | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2002* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Iroda Tulyaganova | 6-3 6-3 | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | #937 | #32 | 900 | 1,726 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Iroda Tulyaganova | #862 | #16 | 1,349 | 1,820 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Iroda Tulyaganova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #114 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #75 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #20 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2002 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #70 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2003 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #50 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #550 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2005 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #87 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #131 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #103 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |