H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jelena Kostanic Tosic vs Maria Elena Camerin H2H: 3-0

Jelena Kostanic Tosic holds a 3–0 lead over Maria Elena Camerin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jelena Kostanic Tosic leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Kostanic Tosic won the 2006 Bangalore quarterfinal 4-2 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Kostanic Tosic
CRO Age 45 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Maria Elena Camerin
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jelena Kostanic Tosic #50 4-2 (ret.) Maria Elena Camerin #92 Match data Feb 18, 2006* QF Bangalore Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Jelena Kostanic Tosic #69 6-1 4-6 7-5 Maria Elena Camerin #95 Match data Feb 10, 2006* R16 Pattaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Jelena Kostanic Tosic #36 3-6 7-5 6-3 Maria Elena Camerin #50 Match data Feb 24, 2005* R32 Qatar Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jelena Kostanic Tosic #937 #32 900 1,709 112 152 42.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maria Elena Camerin #817 #41 774 1,667 98 148 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Maria Elena Camerin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 1–2 33.3% #240 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 4–5 44.4% #97 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 10–13 43.5% #114 1,523 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 4–4 50.0% #131 1,559 0 0 2001 6–5 54.5% #112 1,546 0 0
20 2002 14–17 45.2% #70 1,571 0 0 2002 5–8 38.5% #123 1,524 0 0
21 2003 16–20 44.4% #66 1,621 0 0 2003 3–8 27.3% #100 1,494 0 0
22 2004 22–26 45.8% #35 1,665 0 0 2004 22–20 52.4% #43 1,663 0 0
23 2005 11–21 34.4% #87 1,546 0 0 2005 11–22 33.3% #99 1,564 0 0
24 2006 19–18 51.4% #51 1,576 0 0 2006 22–23 48.9% #50 1,610 0 0
25 2007 10–17 37.0% #103 1,534 0 0 2007 9–18 33.3% #100 1,546 0 0
26 2008 1–5 16.7% #114 1,512 0 0 2008 5–11 31.2% #104 1,512 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2009 5–14 26.3% #114 1,475 0 0
28 2010 0–4 0.0% #830 1,472 0 0 2010 6–11 35.3% #111 1,495 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2011 1–4 20.0% #177 1,491 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #168 1,499 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2013 2–2 50.0% #192 1,519 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Maria Elena Camerin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2003 6 9 15 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2004 11 18 29 37.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 16 11 27 59.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2005 2 10 12 16.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 9 13 22 40.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 16 13 29 55.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 58 81 139 41.7% 51 55 106 48.1% 1 11 12 8.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — 62 71 133 46.6% 32 56 88 36.4% 4 19 23 17.4% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 47/190 of Jelena Kostanic Tosic's and 104/222 of Maria Elena Camerin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Maria Elena Camerin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 4/36 0.5 3.0 64.8% 51.0% 50.9% 32.3% 40.3% 50.9% 36.3% 2003 3/11 1.0 3.3 66.3% 64.6% 48.8% 70.5% 43.5% 59.2% 39.8%
22 2004 6/48 0.5 2.5 66.8% 51.0% 50.3% 56.5% 44.0% 50.4% 40.8% 2004 6/42 1.0 2.7 64.3% 55.2% 46.8% 52.7% 53.4% 51.8% 45.0%
23 2005 5/32 1.6 3.8 67.1% 63.2% 35.8% 50.5% 43.7% 53.6% 40.1% 2005 3/33 0.3 2.3 66.0% 47.5% 32.0% 53.9% 44.4% 42.5% 38.4%
24 2006 8/37 1.5 2.6 67.9% 56.8% 43.5% 51.7% 53.3% 51.9% 38.7% 2006 19/45 0.8 3.7 62.8% 58.0% 45.5% 50.8% 51.1% 53.2% 44.0%
25 2007 17/27 1.6 3.1 67.6% 61.5% 44.5% 53.1% 41.7% 56.0% 38.3% 2007 19/27 0.7 5.8 60.3% 56.8% 40.9% 46.5% 50.0% 50.8% 44.1%
26 2008 3/6 1.7 2.3 63.3% 62.0% 51.1% 65.9% 10.0% 58.1% 29.2% 2008 13/16 0.5 4.5 63.7% 54.4% 41.2% 36.3% 47.4% 49.5% 38.7%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 17/19 0.7 4.3 61.7% 54.9% 39.8% 40.4% 51.9% 49.0% 45.3%
28 2010 4/4 1.0 4.5 64.0% 46.6% 41.6% 36.1% 38.8% 44.8% 36.4% 2010 14/17 1.0 5.9 63.1% 54.9% 38.3% 36.0% 51.1% 48.7% 40.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 5/5 0.6 7.4 57.0% 54.3% 32.2% 39.3% 42.9% 44.3% 43.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 1.3 4.3 57.7% 58.0% 43.3% 62.4% 58.3% 51.6% 45.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 2/4 1.0 5.0 63.2% 53.6% 39.6% 56.1% 46.5% 48.6% 47.0%
Career — 47/264 1.3 3.1 66.7% 57.4% 44.8% 50.6% 41.8% 53.1% 38.0% — 104/246 0.8 4.7 62.2% 55.9% 41.2% 45.2% 50.0% 50.2% 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Maria Elena Camerin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1491 103.8 — — — — — +41 — 42.9% +0.43 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1512 116.4 — — — — +24 +37 — 45.5% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1524 108.3 — — — — +37 +30 — 42.0% -0.68 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1560 116.2 — — — — — +73 — 47.1% +0.18 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.13 2001 1546 108.1 — — — — — +58 — 56.0% +0.12 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.85
20 2002 1571 111.3 — — — — -20 +34 — 42.5% -0.31 8–3 (73%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.28 2002 1525 104.8 — — — — +9 +20 — 35.7% -0.68 2–2 (50%) — — +0.88
21 2003 1622 120.1 -1.74 -2.49 0.739 43.5% -56 +59 — 45.1% -0.46 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.06 2003 1495 108.8 +1.20 -0.47 0.973 50.2% +30 -5 — 38.5% -0.62 0–4 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.46
22 2004 1666 129.7 -1.40 -1.09 0.823 45.7% -81 +96 — 45.4% -0.19 9–7 (56%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.69 2004 1663 123.4 -1.01 -0.43 0.934 48.6% +23 -138 -150 49.0% -0.09 9–3 (75%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.10
23 2005 1547 120.0 -0.58 -1.27 0.864 46.7% -47 +195 — 37.0% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.09 2005 1564 109.3 -3.27 -1.94 0.669 41.3% +36 -101 -92 36.8% -0.65 4–6 (40%) 1–6 (14%) — +1.00
24 2006 1577 119.3 -2.62 -2.72 0.804 45.9% +30 — -175 50.6% -0.05 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.44 2006 1611 121.4 -1.81 -0.26 0.940 49.0% +12 -112 -120 49.5% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.09
25 2007 1534 105.5 -0.32 -3.82 0.871 47.4% +40 +66 — 38.6% -1.12 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — -0.47 2007 1547 119.6 -2.46 -0.09 0.897 47.4% +36 -41 — 39.1% -0.94 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.88
26 2008 1513 110.2 +2.02 -2.68 0.696 44.8% — +50 — 22.2% -1.78 1–0 2–0 — -0.46 2008 1513 107.2 -3.15 -3.06 0.768 44.3% +74 -63 — 39.5% -0.95 1–5 (17%) 2–0 — -0.17
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1476 106.2 -4.26 +0.53 0.887 47.3% +48 -10 -46 33.3% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.07
28 2010 1472 103.1 -1.62 -2.01 0.660 40.8% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.15 2010 1496 96.3 -4.40 -1.63 0.794 44.8% +59 -78 — 34.1% -1.44 5–2 (71%) — — +0.60
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1492 104.5 -2.78 -0.88 0.774 43.8% — -65 — 27.3% -2.27 0–1 — — -0.65
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1500 108.0 -0.75 +0.30 0.931 48.5% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — -0.27
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1520 103.4 -0.44 -2.36 0.915 47.9% — -33 — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 1–1 — -0.06
Career — 1710 121.9 -0.96 -2.67 0.809 45.8% -15 +80 -175 42.8% -0.47 42–33 (56%) 24–27 (47%) 105.1 +0.43 — 1668 116.9 -2.74 -0.75 0.863 46.8% +31 -52 -105 41.9% -0.58 33–44 (43%) 18–20 (47%) 98.0 +0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.