H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jelena Kostanic Tosic vs Myriam Casanova H2H: 1-2
Myriam Casanova holds a 2–1 lead over Jelena Kostanic Tosic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Myriam Casanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Kostanic Tosic won the 2003 Sopot fourth round 6-3 2-6 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 45
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2003* | Sopot | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | 6-3 2-6 7-6(1) | Myriam Casanova | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Myriam Casanova | 6-4 6-3 | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2002* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Myriam Casanova | 6-3 6-4 | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | #937 | #32 | 900 | 1,726 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Myriam Casanova | #936 | #45 | 749 | 1,729 | 27 | 29 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Myriam Casanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 15–6 | 71.4% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2000 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #114 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #120 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2002 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #70 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #87 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #103 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |