H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Jelena Ostapenko vs Anastasija Sevastova H2H: 0-2
Anastasija Sevastova holds a 2–0 lead over Jelena Ostapenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anastasija Sevastova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2025 Madrid second round 7-6(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 29
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2025 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2019* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-2 4-6 6-0 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Ostapenko | #29 | #5 | 5,611 | 2,028 | 289 | 210 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Ostapenko | Anastasija Sevastova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #84 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 1 | 2 | 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #22 | 1,752 | 1 | 2 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,795 | 1 | 3 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #44 | 1,793 | 1 | 3 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #28 | 1,896 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,844 | 1 | 5 | 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2023 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #13 | 1,912 | 1 | 6 | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2024 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #15 | 1,842 | 1 | 8 | 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #23 | 1,773 | 1 | 9 | 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2026 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,869 | 1 | 9 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |