H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 13:17 UTC
Jelena Ostapenko vs Magda Linette H2H: 0-2
Magda Linette holds a 2–0 lead over Jelena Ostapenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magda Linette leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2026 Roland Garros second round 6-2 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 29
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2026 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Magda Linette | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
| Sep 16, 2020* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Magda Linette | 6-4 6-3 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Ostapenko | #29 | #5 | 5,611 | 2,028 | 289 | 210 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Ostapenko | Magda Linette | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #84 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 1 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #22 | 1,752 | 1 | 2 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,795 | 1 | 3 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #44 | 1,793 | 1 | 3 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #28 | 1,896 | 1 | 4 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,844 | 1 | 5 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #13 | 1,912 | 1 | 6 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #15 | 1,842 | 1 | 8 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #23 | 1,773 | 1 | 9 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2026 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,869 | 1 | 9 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 |