H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Jelena Ostapenko vs Maria Sakkari H2H: 1-2
Maria Sakkari holds a 2–1 lead over Jelena Ostapenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Maria Sakkari leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jelena Ostapenko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Sakkari won the 2021 Ostrava fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 29
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GRE
Age 30
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2021* | Ostrava | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Maria Sakkari | 6-4 6-2 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Maria Sakkari | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
| Apr 6, 2017* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Jelena Ostapenko | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Ostapenko | #29 | #5 | 5,611 | 2,028 | 289 | 210 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Maria Sakkari | #37 | #3 | 5,085 | 2,033 | 259 | 205 | 55.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Ostapenko | Maria Sakkari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #84 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 1 | 2 | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #98 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #22 | 1,752 | 1 | 2 | 2017 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,795 | 1 | 3 | 2018 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #44 | 1,793 | 1 | 3 | 2019 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #28 | 1,896 | 1 | 4 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #22 | 1,881 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,844 | 1 | 5 | 2021 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2023 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #13 | 1,912 | 1 | 6 | 2022 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #6 | 1,917 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2024 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #15 | 1,842 | 1 | 8 | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #23 | 1,773 | 1 | 9 | 2024 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #32 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2026 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,869 | 1 | 9 | 2025 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #37 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |