H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jelena Ostapenko vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 2-0
Jelena Ostapenko holds a 2–0 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jelena Ostapenko leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Ostapenko won the 2017 Charleston semifinal 6-3 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 29
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2017* | Charleston | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Jelena Ostapenko | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2017* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Jelena Ostapenko | 6-2 7-6(3) | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Ostapenko | #29 | #5 | 5,611 | 2,028 | 289 | 210 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Ostapenko | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #84 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2016 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2017 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 1 | 2 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #22 | 1,752 | 1 | 2 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2019 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,795 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #44 | 1,793 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #28 | 1,896 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,844 | 1 | 5 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2023 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #13 | 1,912 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #15 | 1,842 | 1 | 8 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #23 | 1,773 | 1 | 9 | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2026 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,869 | 1 | 9 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |