H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jelena Ostapenko vs Sara Sorribes Tormo H2H: 1-1
Jelena Ostapenko and Sara Sorribes Tormo are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jelena Ostapenko leads 1–0 on clay, while Sara Sorribes Tormo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Ostapenko won the 2024 Rome third round 6-4 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 29
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2024* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jelena Ostapenko | 6-4 5-7 6-1 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2016* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Ostapenko | #29 | #5 | 5,611 | 2,028 | 289 | 210 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Ostapenko | Sara Sorribes Tormo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #84 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 1 | 2 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #22 | 1,752 | 1 | 2 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,795 | 1 | 3 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #44 | 1,793 | 1 | 3 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #28 | 1,896 | 1 | 4 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,844 | 1 | 5 | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2023 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #13 | 1,912 | 1 | 6 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2024 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #15 | 1,842 | 1 | 8 | 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #23 | 1,773 | 1 | 9 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2026 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,869 | 1 | 9 | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |