H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Jelena Ostapenko vs Shuai Peng H2H: 1-0

Jelena Ostapenko holds a 1–0 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jelena Ostapenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Ostapenko won the 2017 China Open third round 3-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Ostapenko
Latvia Age 29 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jelena Ostapenko #8 3-0 (ret.) Shuai Peng #25 Match data Oct 5, 2017* R16 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jelena Ostapenko #26 #5 5,611 2,022 300 224 57.3% 1 0 0 5 3 9
Shuai Peng — #14 2,825 1,908 301 264 53.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 2014 1–1 50.0% #271 1,505 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 2015 6–5 54.5% #84 1,563 0 0 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 2016 20–24 45.5% #44 1,587 0 0 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0
20 2017 43–20 68.3% #7 1,904 1 2 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0
21 2018 23–21 52.3% #22 1,764 1 2 2007 19–18 51.4% #45 1,733 0 0
22 2019 25–26 49.0% #45 1,796 1 3 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,706 0 0
23 2020 8–7 53.3% #44 1,794 1 3 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0
24 2021 31–19 62.0% #28 1,886 1 4 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0
25 2022 31–19 62.0% #18 1,842 1 5 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0
26 2023 38–22 63.3% #13 1,904 1 6 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0
27 2024 29–18 61.7% #15 1,821 1 8 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0
28 2025 18–20 47.4% #23 1,757 1 9 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0
29 2026 27–22 55.1% #26 1,852 1 9 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Shuai Peng
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2014 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2017 22 14 36 61.1% 16 4 20 80.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2007 14 14 28 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2019 18 16 34 52.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2020 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2021 18 13 31 58.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — —
25 2022 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
26 2023 23 16 39 59.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2024 18 10 28 64.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2025 8 14 22 36.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2026 15 15 30 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 180 151 331 54.4% 63 47 110 57.3% 57 26 83 68.7% — — — — — 209 177 386 54.1% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 487/526 of Jelena Ostapenko's and 451/554 of Shuai Peng's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Shuai Peng
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2014 2/2 2.5 7.5 50.3% 64.2% 40.8% 59.2% 46.9% 52.5% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 4/11 2.3 8.8 51.3% 68.6% 37.4% 46.0% 55.6% 53.2% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 41/44 3.2 6.0 55.9% 63.9% 44.3% 46.5% 47.3% 55.3% 47.0% 2005 5/36 2.6 2.6 61.4% 60.8% 37.6% 50.9% 53.6% 53.2% 54.0%
20 2017 57/63 3.0 6.0 52.4% 66.3% 44.4% 52.2% 49.7% 55.7% 47.9% 2006 19/35 2.0 2.5 64.1% 56.9% 41.5% 48.6% 49.0% 51.0% 42.0%
21 2018 41/44 3.2 6.0 53.7% 62.2% 43.2% 44.4% 53.4% 53.9% 45.0% 2007 30/37 2.7 1.5 65.5% 61.9% 52.3% 56.6% 43.5% 58.3% 45.5%
22 2019 50/51 2.6 8.5 54.2% 65.5% 40.4% 49.4% 49.8% 53.8% 44.9% 2008 34/48 2.1 2.1 68.0% 60.8% 48.5% 49.1% 48.0% 56.8% 47.4%
23 2020 15/15 2.1 6.7 56.0% 63.0% 42.4% 52.5% 56.4% 54.3% 47.8% 2009 42/45 1.6 1.9 67.7% 60.9% 47.4% 48.7% 47.7% 56.5% 44.5%
24 2021 48/50 2.3 4.9 59.2% 65.5% 44.8% 47.2% 51.4% 57.3% 47.9% 2010 24/28 1.0 1.7 70.1% 61.3% 50.6% 44.9% 43.8% 58.0% 44.3%
25 2022 50/50 3.3 4.5 58.7% 65.7% 46.0% 51.8% 50.2% 57.5% 45.7% 2011 65/71 2.3 1.8 68.3% 66.5% 48.1% 53.5% 47.4% 60.5% 45.7%
26 2023 59/60 3.9 4.8 57.7% 67.9% 44.8% 53.0% 51.2% 58.0% 45.4% 2012 40/45 2.8 2.3 66.8% 64.1% 47.3% 44.4% 52.1% 58.4% 42.4%
27 2024 46/47 4.2 5.5 58.2% 67.2% 44.3% 53.9% 47.3% 57.6% 44.9% 2013 35/36 2.1 2.6 65.1% 62.3% 44.6% 52.6% 47.6% 55.9% 44.7%
28 2025 26/40 3.8 6.3 56.3% 64.1% 42.6% 45.4% 52.0% 54.8% 44.0% 2014 43/50 2.7 2.4 63.3% 64.2% 46.5% 53.4% 53.6% 57.5% 42.3%
29 2026 48/49 4.1 6.3 56.5% 68.9% 40.9% 52.4% 54.5% 56.9% 44.9% 2015 13/13 3.0 3.2 63.2% 59.9% 44.5% 44.8% 38.1% 54.2% 41.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 14/21 2.0 1.8 61.4% 60.2% 45.4% 54.0% 45.8% 54.7% 36.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 57/58 1.7 2.2 63.7% 63.7% 47.7% 55.3% 49.4% 57.8% 47.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 9/10 1.8 2.9 63.8% 60.8% 46.5% 57.7% 47.4% 56.2% 33.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 1.6 2.1 67.6% 62.3% 44.1% 51.6% 41.3% 56.1% 43.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 1.2 1.4 71.8% 63.2% 52.9% 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 43.9%
Career — 487/526 3.3 5.9 56.2% 65.9% 43.5% 50.2% 50.8% 56.1% 45.9% — 451/567 2.1 2.1 66.0% 62.7% 47.2% 51.3% 48.0% 57.3% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Shuai Peng
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02
17 2014 1506 103.0 -0.95 -1.08 0.989 49.6% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.07 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22
18 2015 1564 113.6 -0.38 -0.84 0.917 48.0% +1 — — 51.9% +0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.31 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25
19 2016 1588 129.6 -0.26 +3.66 1.052 51.1% -19 -57 +57 47.0% -0.01 5–9 (36%) 6–2 (75%) 100.1 +0.42 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12
20 2017 1905 140.7 -0.06 +4.38 1.081 51.7% -121 -14 -156 61.0% +0.69 19–7 (73%) 8–7 (53%) 113.0 -0.70 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81
21 2018 1765 135.8 -1.97 +1.80 0.976 49.4% -46 +61 +98 52.5% -0.15 5–6 (45%) 11–3 (79%) 104.3 +1.89 2007 1733 140.4 +2.14 +2.01 1.092 51.8% -35 +19 — 52.4% +0.41 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 97.5 -0.20
22 2019 1797 138.3 -2.06 +2.13 0.973 49.4% -6 -63 +57 49.5% -0.12 10–7 (59%) 6–2 (75%) 105.6 +0.42 2008 1706 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -5 -19 -78 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.61
23 2020 1795 129.8 -1.03 +3.31 1.046 51.1% -14 -42 — 50.0% +0.33 1–1 0–2 — -0.12 2009 1774 142.7 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +15 -139 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70
24 2021 1886 145.5 +0.96 +4.80 1.122 52.4% -58 -102 +128 60.3% +0.78 10–10 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.7 -0.11 2010 1761 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +1 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.7 -1.67
25 2022 1842 151.3 +0.61 +3.32 1.076 51.7% +25 -134 +215 56.9% +0.71 12–8 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 +0.07 2011 1841 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -75 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38
26 2023 1905 154.5 +1.65 +2.98 1.082 51.8% -12 -121 +196 58.2% +0.74 19–11 (63%) 5–6 (45%) 106.0 -0.43 2012 1708 129.3 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +14 +7 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.21
27 2024 1821 149.7 +0.73 +1.92 1.057 51.4% +46 -10 +294 58.3% +0.57 9–5 (64%) 7–3 (70%) 103.5 +1.64 2013 1656 128.3 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24
28 2025 1757 150.0 -1.14 +1.24 0.972 49.2% -23 +167 +300 47.1% +0.15 7–4 (64%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 +0.90 2014 1747 135.1 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27
29 2026 1853 150.5 -0.11 +1.65 1.040 50.7% -34 +53 +188 55.8% +0.33 9–9 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 101.5 +1.37 2015 1702 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +35 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1661 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +53 — +27 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1795 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -154 -48 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30
Career — 2022 150.2 -0.09 +2.87 1.046 51.0% -25 -11 +134 55.0% +0.40 109–79 (58%) 64–46 (58%) 110.0 +1.10 — 1908 141.0 +1.32 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +1 -48 -42 53.9% +0.30 86–95 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.3 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.