H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Jelena Ostapenko vs Sloane Stephens H2H: 1-1
Jelena Ostapenko and Sloane Stephens are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jelena Ostapenko leads 1–0 on grass, while Sloane Stephens leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Ostapenko won the 2019 Eastbourne third round 1-6 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 29
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2019* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Jelena Ostapenko | 1-6 6-0 6-3 | Sloane Stephens | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2018* | Miami | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Sloane Stephens | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Ostapenko | #29 | #5 | 5,611 | 2,028 | 289 | 210 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Sloane Stephens | #315 | #3 | 5,727 | 1,970 | 298 | 240 | 55.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Ostapenko | Sloane Stephens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #204 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #84 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #96 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 1 | 2 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #12 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #22 | 1,752 | 1 | 2 | 2014 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,795 | 1 | 3 | 2015 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #44 | 1,793 | 1 | 3 | 2016 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #28 | 1,896 | 1 | 4 | 2017 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #13 | 1,879 | 1 | 5 |
| 25 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,844 | 1 | 5 | 2018 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #6 | 1,931 | 1 | 6 |
| 26 | 2023 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #13 | 1,912 | 1 | 6 | 2019 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,789 | 1 | 6 |
| 27 | 2024 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #15 | 1,842 | 1 | 8 | 2020 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #39 | 1,642 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 2025 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #23 | 1,773 | 1 | 9 | 2021 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #65 | 1,762 | 1 | 6 |
| 29 | 2026 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,869 | 1 | 9 | 2022 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #37 | 1,784 | 1 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,799 | 1 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #74 | 1,691 | 1 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #479 | 1,607 | 1 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,616 | 1 | 8 |