H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jelena Ostapenko vs Tatjana Maria H2H: 0-3

Tatjana Maria holds a 3–0 lead over Jelena Ostapenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tatjana Maria leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatjana Maria won the 2026 US Open first round 4-6 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Ostapenko
Latvia Age 29 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Tatjana Maria
Germany Age 39 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatjana Maria #83 4-6 6-1 6-2 Jelena Ostapenko #32 Match data Sep 1, 2026 R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Tatjana Maria #112 6-1 1-2 (ret.) Jelena Ostapenko #35 Match data Jun 26, 2026 SF Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Tatjana Maria #103 5-7 7-5 7-5 Jelena Ostapenko #17 Match data Jul 5, 2022* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jelena Ostapenko #32 #5 5,611 2,022 293 219 57.2% 1 0 0 5 3 9
Tatjana Maria #83 #36 1,320 1,822 164 261 38.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Tatjana Maria
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2014 1–1 50.0% #271 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2015 6–5 54.5% #84 1,563 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #136 1,481 0 0
19 2016 20–24 45.5% #44 1,587 0 0 2007 4–11 26.7% #89 1,452 0 0
20 2017 43–20 68.3% #7 1,904 1 2 2008 1–7 12.5% #223 1,423 0 0
21 2018 23–21 52.3% #22 1,764 1 2 2009 6–9 40.0% #71 1,493 0 0
22 2019 25–26 49.0% #45 1,796 1 3 2010 8–16 33.3% #137 1,496 0 0
23 2020 8–7 53.3% #44 1,794 1 3 2011 0–2 0.0% #203 1,468 0 0
24 2021 31–19 62.0% #28 1,885 1 4 2012 2–3 40.0% #112 1,473 0 0
25 2022 31–19 62.0% #18 1,842 1 5 2013 1–6 14.3% #268 1,437 0 0
26 2023 38–22 63.3% #13 1,904 1 6 2014 2–3 40.0% #160 1,446 0 0
27 2024 29–18 61.7% #15 1,821 1 8 2015 10–16 38.5% #74 1,478 0 0
28 2025 17–19 47.2% #23 1,768 1 9 2016 4–15 21.1% #115 1,466 0 0
29 2026 21–18 53.8% #32 1,806 1 9 2017 14–17 45.2% #47 1,565 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2018 12–23 34.3% #72 1,632 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2019 12–20 37.5% #86 1,577 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2020 2–5 28.6% #109 1,586 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2022 17–11 60.7% #68 1,653 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2023 24–25 49.0% #54 1,704 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2024 13–27 32.5% #86 1,576 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 2025 14–19 42.4% #45 1,638 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2026 18–24 42.9% #83 1,794 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Tatjana Maria
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2014 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2017 22 14 36 61.1% 16 4 20 80.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2019 18 16 34 52.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2010 4 8 12 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2020 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2021 18 13 31 58.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2022 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2023 23 16 39 59.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 2014 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2024 18 10 28 64.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2015 3 6 9 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2025 8 14 22 36.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 1 8 9 11.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2026 9 11 20 45.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2017 7 9 16 43.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 4 17 21 19.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 14 16 30 46.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 7 13 20 35.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 4 13 17 23.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7%
Career — 174 147 321 54.2% 63 47 110 57.3% 56 25 81 69.1% — 76 152 228 33.3% 52 79 131 39.7% 36 30 66 54.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 477/514 of Jelena Ostapenko's and 320/356 of Tatjana Maria's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Tatjana Maria
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2014 2/2 2.5 7.5 50.3% 64.2% 40.8% 59.2% 46.9% 52.5% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 4/11 2.3 8.8 51.3% 68.6% 37.4% 46.0% 55.6% 53.2% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 41/44 3.2 6.0 55.9% 63.9% 44.3% 46.5% 47.3% 55.3% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 57/63 3.0 6.0 52.4% 66.3% 44.4% 52.2% 49.7% 55.7% 47.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2018 41/44 3.2 6.0 53.7% 62.2% 43.2% 44.4% 53.4% 53.9% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2019 50/51 2.6 8.5 54.2% 65.5% 40.4% 49.4% 49.8% 53.8% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2020 15/15 2.1 6.7 56.0% 63.0% 42.4% 52.5% 56.4% 54.3% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2021 48/50 2.3 4.9 59.2% 65.5% 44.8% 47.2% 51.4% 57.3% 47.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2022 50/50 3.3 4.5 58.7% 65.7% 46.0% 51.8% 50.2% 57.5% 45.7% 2013 2/7 3.5 6.0 58.2% 51.5% 38.5% 58.6% 33.3% 45.9% 32.1%
26 2023 59/60 3.9 4.8 57.7% 67.9% 44.8% 53.0% 51.2% 58.0% 45.4% 2014 5/5 6.4 4.2 50.8% 62.2% 39.2% 46.8% 53.3% 51.2% 41.2%
27 2024 46/47 4.2 5.5 58.2% 67.2% 44.3% 53.9% 47.3% 57.6% 44.9% 2015 23/26 3.2 2.9 54.7% 68.0% 50.1% 58.5% 46.8% 59.8% 39.4%
28 2025 26/38 3.8 6.3 56.3% 64.1% 42.6% 45.4% 52.0% 54.8% 44.0% 2016 18/19 3.2 2.2 60.4% 59.2% 45.0% 47.9% 47.3% 53.6% 38.9%
29 2026 38/39 3.6 5.9 57.5% 68.9% 39.9% 53.8% 55.6% 56.7% 44.6% 2017 30/31 3.2 2.2 56.2% 69.6% 44.9% 57.7% 48.4% 58.7% 42.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 34/35 4.0 2.7 56.2% 63.7% 43.5% 50.8% 47.7% 54.5% 38.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 31/32 3.4 2.7 54.1% 63.3% 42.7% 48.7% 43.2% 54.0% 39.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 3.6 2.6 60.9% 53.6% 39.4% 47.2% 30.6% 47.8% 39.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 27/29 3.9 3.5 53.3% 71.0% 49.3% 55.7% 50.1% 60.8% 43.9%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 48/49 3.9 2.9 55.1% 65.7% 44.8% 49.5% 56.1% 56.5% 44.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 39/41 3.4 2.9 54.9% 60.2% 41.7% 45.7% 40.6% 52.2% 40.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 15/33 4.7 2.9 57.3% 59.9% 42.1% 43.5% 43.4% 52.1% 41.1%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 41/42 4.3 2.3 60.0% 67.0% 44.1% 53.1% 50.2% 57.7% 42.7%
Career — 477/514 3.2 5.9 56.3% 65.8% 43.5% 50.2% 50.8% 56.1% 45.9% — 320/427 3.8 2.8 56.1% 64.7% 44.4% 51.1% 47.6% 55.8% 41.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Tatjana Maria
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2014 1506 102.9 -0.95 -1.08 0.989 49.6% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 1564 113.6 -0.38 -0.84 0.917 48.0% +1 — — 51.9% +0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.31 2006 1481 99.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16
19 2016 1587 129.6 -0.26 +3.66 1.052 51.1% -18 -56 +58 47.0% -0.01 5–9 (36%) 6–2 (75%) 100.1 +0.42 2007 1452 109.9 — — — — +12 +66 +133 26.7% -1.40 0–2 — — -0.16
20 2017 1905 140.7 -0.06 +4.38 1.081 51.7% -121 -14 -156 61.0% +0.69 19–7 (73%) 8–7 (53%) 113.0 -0.70 2008 1424 111.5 — — — — +28 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 0–1 — -0.49
21 2018 1765 135.8 -1.97 +1.80 0.976 49.4% -46 +60 +98 52.5% -0.15 5–6 (45%) 11–3 (79%) 104.3 +1.89 2009 1493 111.4 — — — — -29 +34 — 36.4% -1.18 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -0.55
22 2019 1797 138.3 -2.06 +2.13 0.973 49.4% -6 -63 +57 49.5% -0.12 10–7 (59%) 6–2 (75%) 105.6 +0.41 2010 1497 109.5 — — — — -12 -1 — 35.7% -1.07 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.3 -0.82
23 2020 1795 129.8 -1.03 +3.31 1.046 51.1% -14 -42 — 50.0% +0.33 1–1 0–2 — -0.12 2011 1469 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.16
24 2021 1886 145.5 +0.96 +4.80 1.122 52.4% -58 -102 +128 60.3% +0.78 10–10 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.7 -0.11 2012 1473 101.7 — — — — -16 — — 41.7% -0.67 1–1 1–1 — +0.36
25 2022 1842 151.3 +0.61 +3.32 1.076 51.7% +25 -134 +215 56.9% +0.71 12–8 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 +0.07 2013 1438 94.6 -2.28 -2.31 0.593 40.1% +20 +16 — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.01
26 2023 1905 154.5 +1.65 +2.98 1.082 51.8% -12 -121 +196 58.2% +0.74 19–11 (63%) 5–6 (45%) 106.0 -0.43 2014 1447 95.9 -2.52 -1.88 0.844 46.7% +20 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 1–1 — +0.29
27 2024 1821 149.7 +0.73 +1.92 1.057 51.4% +46 -10 +294 58.3% +0.57 9–5 (64%) 7–3 (70%) 103.5 +1.64 2015 1479 110.7 +0.60 -1.33 0.980 49.7% -7 -43 +112 43.1% -0.31 1–5 (17%) 4–2 (67%) 99.3 +0.67
28 2025 1769 150.6 -1.17 +1.25 0.972 49.2% -34 +155 — 45.8% +0.11 7–4 (64%) 2–5 (29%) 99.3 +0.73 2016 1466 112.4 -1.11 -3.07 0.839 46.4% -9 -23 — 24.4% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.2 +0.04
29 2026 1807 143.7 -0.48 +1.17 1.030 50.5% -68 +101 +265 54.9% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 2–3 (40%) 98.1 +2.00 2017 1566 124.1 +1.13 -0.63 1.024 51.0% -48 -14 -21 46.0% -0.06 0–5 (0%) 1–0 — +0.89
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1632 116.0 -1.90 -3.62 0.840 46.7% -69 -111 +75 35.8% -1.16 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 104.4 -0.09
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1578 121.2 -1.61 -2.85 0.849 46.9% +26 -142 +163 42.3% -0.79 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.1 -0.64
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1587 109.8 -3.38 -1.03 0.757 43.7% +15 — — 25.0% -2.19 2–0 1–1 — -0.80
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1511 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1653 128.1 +2.42 +0.72 1.120 52.4% -89 -82 +219 60.0% +0.86 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 103.4 +1.07
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1705 130.4 +0.14 +0.47 1.013 50.4% -13 -95 +119 50.0% +0.10 6–10 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 94.6 +1.59
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1576 112.0 -3.26 -2.66 0.853 46.5% +21 -40 +207 33.0% -1.51 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) 97.1 +1.34
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1638 120.9 -2.97 -1.00 0.857 46.5% -65 -154 +320 44.7% -0.55 4–6 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 99.6 +0.73
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1795 129.7 +0.56 -0.21 1.009 50.2% -226 -248 +315 44.9% -0.19 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 96.0 +0.32
Career — 2022 149.7 -0.12 +2.85 1.045 51.0% -27 -7 +135 54.9% +0.40 107–78 (58%) 60–44 (58%) 108.9 +1.21 — 1822 123.0 -0.64 -1.32 0.932 48.7% -35 -65 +192 40.4% -0.69 44–69 (39%) 44–49 (47%) 97.2 +0.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.