H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Jennifer Brady vs Anastasia Pivovarova H2H: 1-1
Jennifer Brady and Anastasia Pivovarova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jennifer Brady won the 2016 Guangzhou third round 4-6 6-4 4-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 36
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2016* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jennifer Brady | 4-6 6-4 4-0 (ret.) | Anastasia Pivovarova | Match data |
| Sep 19, 2016 | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anastasia Pivovarova | 6-4 (ret.) | Jennifer Brady | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Brady | #618 | #13 | 3,840 | 1,942 | 72 | 76 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anastasia Pivovarova | #1,060 | #93 | 731 | 1,539 | 9 | 27 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jennifer Brady | Anastasia Pivovarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #152 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #121 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #429 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #115 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,872 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |