H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jennifer Brady vs Zarina Diyas H2H: 0-1

Zarina Diyas holds a 1–0 lead over Jennifer Brady in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zarina Diyas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zarina Diyas won the 2018 Miami Open first round 7-5 7-6(8).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jennifer Brady
United States Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Zarina Diyas
Kazakhstan Age 32 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zarina Diyas #56 7-5 7-6(8) Jennifer Brady #83 Match data Mar 22, 2018* R128 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jennifer Brady #618 #13 3,840 1,947 72 76 48.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Zarina Diyas #437 #31 1,495 1,756 99 128 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jennifer Brady Zarina Diyas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2009 2–1 66.7% #242 1,528 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2010 2–4 33.3% #172 1,539 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2011 1–4 20.0% #227 1,504 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 0–2 0.0% #264 1,477 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 1–1 50.0% #163 1,477 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2014 20–14 58.8% #33 1,682 0 0
21 2016 3–5 37.5% #118 1,531 0 0 2015 20–27 42.6% #52 1,560 0 0
22 2017 10–14 41.7% #65 1,658 0 0 2016 8–12 40.0% #150 1,552 0 0
23 2018 5–13 27.8% #115 1,558 0 0 2017 7–4 63.6% #66 1,665 0 1
24 2019 15–16 48.4% #55 1,769 0 0 2018 13–19 40.6% #89 1,717 0 1
25 2020 19–9 67.9% #24 1,920 0 1 2019 7–13 35.0% #77 1,704 0 1
26 2021 15–11 57.7% #25 1,868 0 1 2020 5–6 45.5% #80 1,659 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2021 13–17 43.3% #102 1,688 0 1
28 2023 5–5 50.0% #233 1,847 0 1 2022 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,680 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2024 0–2 0.0% #382 1,631 0 1
31 2026 0–3 0.0% #618 1,753 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #437 1,545 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jennifer Brady Zarina Diyas
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 15 10 25 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 11 17 28 39.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 2017 9 9 18 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2018 3 8 11 27.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2017 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2019 9 10 19 47.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2018 9 11 20 45.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2020 19 8 27 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2021 10 7 17 58.8% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2020 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2023 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2026 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 52 109 52.3% 9 18 27 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% — 68 85 153 44.4% 19 30 49 38.8% 12 13 25 48.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 143/148 of Jennifer Brady's and 217/227 of Zarina Diyas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jennifer Brady Zarina Diyas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/3 3.0 2.5 53.3% 69.6% 41.1% 60.7% 64.6% 56.3% 58.9%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 6/6 1.8 5.8 57.9% 62.6% 42.3% 41.2% 52.3% 53.9% 40.8%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 5/5 2.6 4.2 61.8% 61.5% 40.9% 48.2% 59.0% 54.1% 40.1%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 2/2 0.0 7.5 42.5% 60.7% 29.5% 23.6% 45.0% 41.7% 43.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 2/2 4.0 3.0 68.2% 67.7% 55.4% 61.1% 72.7% 64.6% 35.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 32/34 1.6 3.1 68.2% 58.4% 47.3% 49.4% 51.1% 55.1% 45.8%
21 2016 8/8 3.1 3.8 53.5% 69.9% 48.8% 33.3% 39.1% 59.9% 43.3% 2015 41/47 1.2 3.3 71.2% 57.9% 47.0% 48.3% 51.6% 54.7% 44.1%
22 2017 24/24 4.3 3.8 53.6% 66.8% 47.8% 54.3% 46.6% 58.3% 40.7% 2016 20/20 2.6 2.6 70.3% 60.5% 41.6% 48.5% 49.8% 54.9% 43.9%
23 2018 15/18 3.9 3.2 55.4% 65.7% 49.4% 56.4% 50.9% 57.9% 40.9% 2017 11/11 3.3 3.5 68.1% 64.5% 46.2% 53.5% 57.0% 58.7% 45.1%
24 2019 31/31 5.2 2.9 55.6% 71.2% 46.8% 57.5% 43.8% 59.9% 41.4% 2018 32/32 2.2 3.0 67.3% 61.4% 48.3% 52.6% 44.3% 56.7% 42.8%
25 2020 28/28 5.3 1.9 57.8% 70.0% 53.6% 59.1% 45.0% 63.0% 42.8% 2019 20/20 0.9 2.4 69.6% 59.4% 44.8% 45.3% 36.7% 55.0% 42.1%
26 2021 24/26 4.2 2.5 55.3% 72.0% 49.6% 63.1% 51.0% 62.2% 42.8% 2020 11/11 1.6 2.8 74.3% 57.0% 47.6% 53.8% 48.6% 54.4% 44.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 29/30 1.5 3.1 67.2% 60.0% 42.6% 48.1% 46.7% 54.3% 41.3%
28 2023 10/10 2.2 3.6 53.8% 61.7% 50.5% 46.5% 50.2% 56.8% 41.6% 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 70.2% 56.2% 67.7% 66.7% 20.0% 59.6% 33.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 2/2 0.0 1.5 70.9% 46.7% 31.4% 45.5% 38.8% 42.6% 40.0%
31 2026 3/3 2.0 1.7 57.9% 63.0% 52.9% 42.9% 13.3% 58.5% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 1/1 1.0 3.0 68.3% 61.0% 31.6% 55.6% 20.0% 51.7% 36.4%
Career — 143/148 4.4 2.9 55.4% 68.9% 49.5% 55.7% 46.0% 60.2% 41.7% — 217/227 1.7 3.1 68.4% 59.8% 45.4% 49.3% 48.4% 55.1% 43.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jennifer Brady Zarina Diyas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1528 105.5 +0.98 +1.13 1.348 57.6% — +48 — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1539 114.4 +0.14 -1.62 0.883 47.6% +19 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -0.06
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1505 103.6 -1.72 -1.18 0.875 47.5% +17 — — 33.3% -1.08 0–2 — — +0.16
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1477 95.3 -2.37 -3.62 0.739 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1478 100.3 -1.99 -0.40 1.012 50.7% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–2 — +0.31
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1683 130.0 -0.83 +1.87 1.021 50.5% -29 -121 -28 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 7–4 (64%) 111.0 +0.75
21 2016 1532 119.3 +1.26 -0.83 1.079 51.1% +7 +38 — 37.5% -0.31 0–2 — — +0.17 2015 1561 125.0 -2.62 +2.02 0.975 49.5% -15 -26 +133 47.0% -0.32 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 91.8 +1.00
22 2017 1659 126.5 +1.17 -2.06 0.975 49.6% +14 -117 — 42.6% -0.46 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.3 +0.25 2016 1553 119.4 -0.44 +0.63 0.974 49.5% +1 -18 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 +0.38
23 2018 1559 118.4 +0.71 -1.86 0.972 49.4% +15 -60 +45 31.6% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 0–7 (0%) 94.7 -0.20 2017 1665 121.5 +1.12 +0.16 1.091 52.1% +6 — +15 57.7% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.1 +0.69
24 2019 1769 135.7 +2.53 -0.29 1.031 50.8% -7 -264 -121 50.6% +0.10 6–9 (40%) 4–5 (44%) 100.7 -2.24 2018 1718 138.2 -0.01 -0.24 0.989 49.8% +12 -125 — 44.9% -0.07 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -2.35
25 2020 1920 159.5 +5.30 +0.74 1.159 53.1% +33 — — 62.5% +1.02 6–2 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.9 -1.12 2019 1704 128.4 -1.13 -1.09 0.937 48.5% +30 — — 44.2% -0.58 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.02
26 2021 1868 147.8 +4.73 +0.51 1.132 52.5% +29 -247 — 64.2% +1.02 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 99.8 +0.50 2020 1660 115.9 -0.51 +0.34 0.969 49.6% +68 -136 — 44.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -0.43
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1688 125.7 -1.93 -1.44 0.902 47.7% +47 -117 -89 43.8% -0.62 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -1.46
28 2023 1848 137.0 +0.45 +0.43 0.964 49.4% +35 — — 54.5% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 101.0 -0.31 2022 1681 107.4 -0.79 +5.23 0.833 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.23
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1631 100.1 -0.16 -2.90 0.697 41.4% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.15
31 2026 1754 99.9 -0.77 -5.28 0.804 46.0% — — — 14.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.20 2025 1549 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1546 107.0 -0.57 -1.68 0.752 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12
Career — 1948 143.6 +2.74 -0.50 1.047 51.0% +19 -165 -71 50.5% +0.21 22–25 (47%) 20–22 (48%) 98.6 -1.88 — 1756 131.4 -1.07 +0.30 0.966 49.3% +8 -81 +46 46.2% -0.25 32–36 (47%) 22–29 (43%) 97.4 -0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.