H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jennifer Hopkins vs Mariana Diaz-Oliva H2H: 2-0
Jennifer Hopkins holds a 2–0 lead over Mariana Diaz-Oliva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jennifer Hopkins leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jennifer Hopkins won the 2001 Wimbledon first round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jennifer Hopkins | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2001* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jennifer Hopkins | 6-1 7-5 | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Hopkins | #1,286 | #52 | 671 | 1,636 | 37 | 71 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mariana Diaz-Oliva | #452 | #42 | 696 | 1,654 | 86 | 129 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jennifer Hopkins | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #84 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #57 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #140 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #106 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #107 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #212 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #55 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #58 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #192 | 1,460 | 0 | 1 |