H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jennifer Mundel vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 0-1

Larisa Savchenko holds a 1–0 lead over Jennifer Mundel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1988 Indianapolis round of 32 6-3 6-7 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jennifer Mundel
RSA Age 64 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Larisa Savchenko
URS Age 60 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Larisa Savchenko #16 6-3 6-7 6-0 Jennifer Mundel Match data Oct 27, 1988* R32 Indianapolis WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jennifer Mundel #321 #78 7 1,747 79 107 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 240 241 49.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jennifer Mundel Larisa Savchenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 1–5 16.7% — 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0
17 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,501 0 0 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,506 0 0
18 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,604 0 1 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,673 0 0
19 1981 14–10 58.3% — 1,654 0 1 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,752 0 0
20 1982 13–13 50.0% — 1,663 0 1 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,793 0 0
21 1983 16–24 40.0% — 1,651 0 2 1988 28–17 62.2% #16 1,869 0 0
22 1984 6–17 26.1% #78 1,574 0 2 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,861 0 0
23 1985 3–7 30.0% — 1,567 0 2 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,706 0 0
24 1986 7–13 35.0% #115 1,527 0 2 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,699 0 1
25 1987 3–7 30.0% #161 1,511 0 2 1992 18–19 48.6% #58 1,720 0 1
26 1988 0–1 0.0% #321 1,508 0 2 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,752 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2
28 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,505 0 2 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,650 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,668 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,620 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,585 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jennifer Mundel Larisa Savchenko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1979 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
18 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
19 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1982 5 3 8 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
21 1983 7 10 17 41.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1988 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
23 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1990 3 9 12 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1986 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3%
25 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1992 9 8 17 52.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
28 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 28 42 70 40.0% 21 26 47 44.7% 22 27 49 44.9% 1 8 9 11.1% — 97 102 199 48.7% 27 47 74 36.5% 70 46 116 60.3% 46 46 92 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jennifer Mundel Larisa Savchenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1977 1473 102.6 — — — — — +22 — 28.6% -1.00 0–2 — — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1498 109.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.18
17 1979 1501 96.5 — — — — +141 — — 33.3% -1.33 — 0–1 — +0.54 1984 1507 116.6 — — — — — +100 +55 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) — — +0.25
18 1980 1604 117.8 — — — — +15 +47 — 65.1% +1.23 5–0 (100%) 4–1 (80%) 109.3 +2.11 1985 1674 126.0 — — — — -46 -159 -3 44.2% -0.31 9–6 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 104.0 -0.37
19 1981 1655 121.2 — — — — -6 +50 -80 55.8% +0.13 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.65 1986 1752 135.5 — — — — -106 -188 +58 51.2% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.9 -1.29
20 1982 1664 119.9 — — — — +8 -9 -51 48.3% -0.05 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — -0.13 1987 1793 136.6 — — — — -74 -246 +115 60.8% +0.61 5–2 (71%) 2–5 (29%) 102.1 +1.13
21 1983 1652 117.2 — — — — -37 -16 +41 40.9% -0.57 7–6 (54%) 2–3 (40%) 101.4 +1.59 1988 1870 156.5 — — — — -44 — +85 56.9% +0.37 13–8 (62%) 11–6 (65%) 107.7 -2.81
22 1984 1574 113.0 — — — — -17 -16 +129 23.4% -2.04 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.75 1989 1862 145.0 — — — — +27 -238 +26 60.2% +0.39 5–10 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.3 -0.82
23 1985 1568 111.1 — — — — -26 — +102 30.4% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.03 1990 1707 132.7 — — — — -4 -54 +235 43.7% -0.39 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 97.9 -0.20
24 1986 1527 107.7 — — — — -7 +9 +123 38.3% -0.79 3–4 (43%) 1–2 (33%) 98.6 +1.05 1991 1699 122.6 — — — — +18 -58 +204 53.7% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 99.3 +1.48
25 1987 1512 105.1 — — — — -19 — +139 30.4% -1.65 2–1 (67%) — — +0.32 1992 1721 141.5 — — — — +9 -77 +179 49.4% -0.16 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 96.8 -1.79
26 1988 1509 104.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.25 1993 1753 140.6 — — — — +6 -113 +158 52.3% -0.05 7–5 (58%) 3–6 (33%) 98.9 -0.11
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1809 144.2 — — — — -28 -170 +83 48.4% -0.13 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 102.0 -3.68
28 1990 1506 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.23 1995 1650 126.3 — — — — +4 -8 +193 39.1% -0.65 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 +0.43
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1668 126.6 — — — — -51 -53 +258 44.1% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — -1.58
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1621 121.0 — — — — +6 -24 +203 38.0% -0.46 5–3 (63%) 0–6 (0%) 97.6 +0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1653 111.5 — — — — -22 -84 +168 48.8% -0.10 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 102.7 +0.09
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1586 92.7 — — — — -28 -65 +209 28.0% -2.28 2–3 (40%) — — +0.24
Career — 1747 119.1 — — — — -11 +17 +41 42.1% -0.58 28–19 (60%) 10–12 (45%) 106.7 +3.75 — 1927 142.7 — — — — -21 -97 +127 49.6% -0.13 96–79 (55%) 46–56 (45%) 98.2 -1.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.