H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jennifer Mundel vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 0-1
Leila Meskhi holds a 1–0 lead over Jennifer Mundel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1990 Indianapolis third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1990* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Leila Meskhi | 6-1 6-2 | Jennifer Mundel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Mundel | #321 | #78 | 7 | 1,748 | 79 | 107 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jennifer Mundel | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 16–24 | 40.0% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1984 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #78 | 1,575 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1985 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1986 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #115 | 1,528 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1987 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #161 | 1,512 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |