H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Jennifer Mundel vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-0

Jennifer Mundel holds a 1–0 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jennifer Mundel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jennifer Mundel won the 1983 Bakersfield semifinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jennifer Mundel
RSA Age 64 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jennifer Mundel 6-3 6-4 Lori Mcneil Match data Oct 1, 1983* SF Bakersfield WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jennifer Mundel — #78 7 1,747 79 107 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lori Mcneil — #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jennifer Mundel Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 1–5 16.7% — 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,501 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,604 0 1 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1981 14–10 58.3% — 1,655 0 1 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1982 13–13 50.0% — 1,664 0 1 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1983 16–24 40.0% — 1,652 0 2 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1984 6–17 26.1% — 1,574 0 2 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1985 3–7 30.0% — 1,568 0 2 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 1986 7–13 35.0% #115 1,527 0 2 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 1987 3–7 30.0% #161 1,512 0 2 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1988 0–1 0.0% — 1,509 0 2 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 — — — — — — — 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,506 0 2 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,671 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jennifer Mundel Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1979 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1982 5 3 8 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1983 7 10 17 41.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 1986 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 42 70 40.0% 21 26 47 44.7% 22 27 49 44.9% 1 8 9 11.1% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jennifer Mundel Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1977 1473 102.6 — — — — — +21 — 28.6% -1.00 0–2 — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 1979 1501 96.5 — — — — +140 — — 33.3% -1.33 — 0–1 — +0.54 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1980 1604 117.8 — — — — +16 +47 — 65.1% +1.23 5–0 (100%) 4–1 (80%) 109.3 +1.95 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1981 1655 121.3 — — — — -7 +50 -79 55.8% +0.13 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.60 1983 1569 107.2 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1982 1664 120.0 — — — — +8 -9 -50 48.3% -0.05 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — -0.29 1984 1609 115.3 — — — — +12 -55 +9 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32
21 1983 1652 117.5 — — — — -37 -15 +41 40.9% -0.57 7–6 (54%) 2–3 (40%) 101.4 +1.64 1985 1588 118.5 — — — — +21 -104 +4 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.23
22 1984 1575 113.1 — — — — -17 -17 +128 23.4% -2.04 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.74 1986 1885 145.0 — — — — -9 -342 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.25
23 1985 1568 111.1 — — — — -25 — +102 30.4% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.03 1987 2007 158.5 — — — — +54 -354 -204 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.70
24 1986 1528 107.8 — — — — -8 +9 +122 38.3% -0.79 3–4 (43%) 1–2 (33%) 98.6 +1.00 1988 1902 142.7 — — — — +35 -186 +38 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +1.98
25 1987 1512 105.1 — — — — -18 — +139 30.4% -1.65 2–1 (67%) — — +0.32 1989 1761 134.8 — — — — +59 -79 +78 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.28
26 1988 1509 104.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.25 1990 1696 135.0 — — — — +13 -75 +199 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1870 151.1 — — — — +12 -241 +44 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 1990 1506 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.23 1992 1962 156.9 — — — — -4 -303 +75 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1872 146.0 — — — — -59 -207 +243 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +385 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +310 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 1748 119.2 — — — — -11 +17 +41 42.1% -0.58 28–19 (60%) 10–12 (45%) 106.7 +3.50 — 2025 149.3 — — — — +13 -213 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.