H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Emma Raducanu H2H: 3-1
Jessica Pegula holds a 3–1 lead over Emma Raducanu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jessica Pegula leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Emma Raducanu leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jessica Pegula won the 2025 Beijing third round 3-6 7-6(9) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 23
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2025 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 3-6 7-6(9) 6-0 | Emma Raducanu | Match data |
| Mar 27, 2025 | Miami | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-4 6-7(3) 6-2 | Emma Raducanu | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2024* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Emma Raducanu | 4-6 7-6(6) 7-5 | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2022* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 7-5 6-4 | Emma Raducanu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Emma Raducanu | #38 | #10 | 2,975 | 1,950 | 90 | 72 | 55.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessica Pegula | Emma Raducanu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,723 | 1 | 1 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #78 | 1,731 | 1 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #298 | 1,751 | 1 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #56 | 1,835 | 1 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #29 | 1,876 | 1 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #38 | 1,834 | 1 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |