H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:33 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Sara Sorribes Tormo H2H: 2-0
Jessica Pegula holds a 2–0 lead over Sara Sorribes Tormo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jessica Pegula leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jessica Pegula won the 2026 Wimbledon second round 7-6(6) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2026 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Jessica Pegula | 7-6(6) 6-1 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
| May 5, 2022* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Jessica Pegula | 6-4 6-2 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
| Apr 2, 2016 | Charleston | WTA 500 | Q1 | Clay | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 2-6 6-1 7-5 | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessica Pegula | Sara Sorribes Tormo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |