H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:15 UTC
Jessie Aney vs Coco Vandeweghe
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jessie Aney vs Coco Vandeweghe.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 28
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessie Aney | #391 | #345 | 172 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Coco Vandeweghe | #815 | #9 | 3,258 | 1,877 | 138 | 151 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessie Aney | Coco Vandeweghe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #476 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #322 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #113 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #39 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #100 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #241 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #174 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,533 | 0 | 2 |