H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jie Zheng vs Anastasia Myskina H2H: 1-2
Anastasia Myskina holds a 2–1 lead over Jie Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Myskina leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2006 Stockholm final 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2006* | Stockholm | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Jie Zheng | 6-4 6-1 | Anastasia Myskina | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2006* | Dubai | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | 6-3 6-7(7) 6-1 | Jie Zheng | Match data |
| Mar 6, 2004* | Doha | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | 6-2 7-5 | Jie Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Anastasia Myskina | #1,101 | #2 | 4,247 | 2,084 | 235 | 138 | 63.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Anastasia Myskina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #59 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #7 | 1,958 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #3 | 2,040 | 1 | 9 |
| 23 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #14 | 1,934 | 1 | 10 |
| 24 | 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #16 | 1,818 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,769 | 1 | 10 |
| 26 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |