H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jie Zheng vs Anna Chakvetadze H2H: 0-3

Anna Chakvetadze holds a 3–0 lead over Jie Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anna Chakvetadze leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2007 Hobart International quarterfinal 4-6 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jie Zheng
CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Anna Chakvetadze
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anna Chakvetadze #13 4-6 6-1 6-1 Jie Zheng #34 Match data Jan 13, 2007* QF Hobart International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Anna Chakvetadze #36 5-7 6-2 6-4 Jie Zheng #55 Match data Jan 18, 2006* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Anna Chakvetadze #30 6-4 6-4 Jie Zheng #64 Match data Aug 27, 2005* QF New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,906 218 196 52.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Anna Chakvetadze #577 #5 2,940 2,066 183 135 57.5% 0 1 0 2 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jie Zheng Anna Chakvetadze
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2004 2–3 40.0% #83 1,527 0 0
18 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,506 0 0 2005 24–21 53.3% #32 1,715 0 0
19 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0 2006 37–20 64.9% #13 1,914 0 2
20 2004 10–18 35.7% #79 1,546 0 0 2007 56–19 74.7% #6 1,988 0 6
21 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,702 0 1 2008 26–23 53.1% #18 1,723 0 7
22 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,777 0 3 2009 14–18 43.8% #67 1,714 0 7
23 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3 2010 18–15 54.5% #56 1,714 0 8
24 2008 22–11 66.7% #25 1,845 0 3 2011 3–8 27.3% #234 1,640 0 8
25 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,782 0 3 2012 3–8 27.3% #224 1,555 0 8
26 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,762 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 2012 25–24 51.0% #26 1,652 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,687 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jie Zheng Anna Chakvetadze
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2003 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 23 11 34 67.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 39 13 52 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
22 2006 12 9 21 57.1% 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 14 10 24 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2011 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2009 19 13 32 59.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2010 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 17 15 32 53.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143 126 269 53.2% 48 44 92 52.2% 24 22 46 52.2% 3 4 7 42.9% — 121 86 207 58.5% 29 30 59 49.2% 22 15 37 59.5% 11 4 15 73.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 286/397 of Jie Zheng's and 250/318 of Anna Chakvetadze's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jie Zheng Anna Chakvetadze
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/5 3.3 5.3 61.2% 60.8% 43.7% 34.3% 55.6% 54.0% 45.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 13/45 1.8 4.8 58.2% 62.8% 38.8% 47.2% 39.5% 53.3% 43.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 39/57 2.9 3.7 59.4% 64.2% 46.6% 54.3% 46.9% 57.0% 44.8%
20 2004 5/28 0.2 3.2 67.1% 53.1% 34.7% 39.7% 34.3% 47.4% 39.7% 2007 67/75 3.0 3.7 60.3% 66.4% 49.0% 57.7% 51.2% 59.4% 47.0%
21 2005 3/39 0.3 1.7 73.6% 54.5% 45.8% 58.2% 43.9% 52.9% 38.8% 2008 44/49 3.6 6.5 55.3% 64.7% 41.6% 55.3% 53.0% 54.3% 47.1%
22 2006 24/41 0.5 2.0 72.3% 57.7% 47.0% 48.1% 46.4% 54.3% 46.5% 2009 31/32 1.8 5.7 63.5% 60.6% 41.0% 48.9% 53.9% 53.4% 44.7%
23 2007 16/17 0.5 1.8 71.3% 62.6% 45.3% 56.9% 44.4% 57.9% 45.5% 2010 33/33 1.7 5.0 61.2% 60.5% 45.7% 53.6% 50.7% 55.1% 45.8%
24 2008 24/33 1.2 2.0 64.9% 62.6% 48.5% 56.7% 50.6% 57.3% 47.3% 2011 9/11 2.1 3.8 58.9% 60.7% 41.5% 50.7% 47.5% 53.1% 46.0%
25 2009 44/48 0.6 2.2 70.2% 61.5% 47.3% 51.4% 52.7% 57.3% 45.8% 2012 11/11 2.5 3.4 60.5% 62.6% 40.0% 44.4% 57.5% 53.5% 41.2%
26 2010 39/41 0.5 2.8 69.7% 57.6% 43.9% 55.1% 47.7% 53.4% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 36/41 0.3 2.5 73.5% 57.0% 40.0% 48.0% 48.8% 52.5% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 38/49 0.5 2.4 68.6% 60.5% 46.7% 49.0% 51.9% 56.3% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 33/34 0.4 2.7 70.4% 56.4% 44.3% 47.0% 46.9% 52.9% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 23/25 0.3 2.0 70.5% 57.6% 42.9% 53.2% 57.7% 53.1% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 1/1 0.0 3.0 64.7% 48.5% 27.8% 61.5% 14.3% 41.2% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 286/414 0.5 2.3 70.1% 58.9% 44.8% 51.2% 49.4% 54.7% 44.9% — 250/318 2.7 4.7 59.7% 63.6% 44.6% 53.4% 50.7% 55.9% 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jie Zheng Anna Chakvetadze
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1528 120.5 +0.93 +0.41 0.997 50.0% +25 — — 46.2% -0.15 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.22
18 2002 1507 104.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 1–1 — +0.03 2005 1716 140.9 -0.63 +0.16 0.934 48.6% -37 -113 -71 51.9% +0.09 10–6 (63%) 0–7 (0%) 103.3 -1.79
19 2003 1536 113.8 — — — — +24 — — 51.6% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.41 2006 1915 148.0 +1.63 +1.41 1.040 50.8% -5 -246 -221 63.0% +0.79 10–5 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 107.1 -2.00
20 2004 1547 127.3 -2.88 -1.53 0.755 43.6% +22 +39 -34 39.7% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 2–0 — +0.21 2007 1988 159.4 +3.68 +3.72 1.156 53.1% +9 -222 -132 69.6% +1.32 15–4 (79%) 11–10 (52%) 107.4 -0.45
21 2005 1702 131.1 -0.46 -1.44 0.823 45.8% -19 -40 — 55.4% +0.42 11–5 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 107.3 -0.22 2008 1724 136.7 -0.16 +2.53 1.031 50.8% +43 -1 +130 53.3% +0.29 12–14 (46%) 4–6 (40%) 92.8 +2.95
22 2006 1778 132.0 -1.03 +1.40 1.019 50.5% -50 -22 -207 58.9% +0.37 7–8 (47%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 -0.42 2009 1714 134.0 -0.92 +1.31 0.958 49.2% +9 +9 +92 45.7% -0.32 8–9 (47%) 6–5 (55%) 98.5 -0.09
23 2007 1690 124.7 +1.30 +1.45 1.082 51.4% -13 +33 — 45.9% -0.08 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.7 -0.24 2010 1714 128.7 -0.49 +1.32 1.020 50.4% +15 -55 +111 56.8% +0.36 6–6 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.41
24 2008 1845 147.4 +1.86 +3.35 1.109 52.4% -68 -101 -119 59.7% +1.01 7–1 (88%) 2–3 (40%) 107.4 -2.42 2011 1641 112.2 +0.12 +1.73 0.980 49.6% +60 — — 37.5% -0.88 — 1–1 — -0.46
25 2009 1782 142.7 +1.41 +2.49 1.073 51.6% +25 -47 -70 54.5% +0.39 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) 104.2 -0.17 2012 1556 102.0 -1.55 -1.87 0.886 47.7% +83 +20 — 36.4% -0.91 0–2 0–1 — +0.48
26 2010 1763 139.6 -1.89 +1.53 0.971 49.4% +49 -45 -75 52.6% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 7–0 (100%) 106.1 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 1705 120.3 -2.95 -0.51 0.903 47.7% +56 -98 -88 43.9% -0.58 9–9 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 1653 131.5 +0.57 +1.44 1.024 50.6% +36 -75 +52 49.5% -0.10 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.4 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1688 126.6 -2.38 +0.84 0.941 48.5% -1 -50 — 47.5% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 107.5 +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 1670 119.0 -1.86 +0.63 0.939 48.7% -33 -52 +57 46.2% -0.42 2–2 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.8 -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 1648 95.9 -0.62 -1.23 0.644 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1906 137.9 -0.68 +1.30 0.991 49.8% +7 -35 -39 50.9% +0.03 73–58 (56%) 47–31 (60%) 109.8 -0.49 — 2067 147.7 +0.95 +1.99 1.038 50.8% +11 -114 -36 56.9% +0.44 62–48 (56%) 29–38 (43%) 99.6 -0.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.