H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jie Zheng vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 2-0
Jie Zheng holds a 2–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jie Zheng leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2009 US Open first round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2009* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jie Zheng | 6-3 6-2 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2006* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jie Zheng | 6-4 7-5 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jie Zheng | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |