H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jie Zheng vs Jamea Jackson H2H: 2-0

Jie Zheng holds a 2–0 lead over Jamea Jackson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jie Zheng leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2005 Guangzhou Open round of 16 6-1 7-5.

CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 0
2 main-draw meetings
USA Age 40 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jie Zheng #47 6-1 7-5 Jamea Jackson #76 Match data Sep 30, 2005* R16 Guangzhou Open Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Jie Zheng #64 6-3 6-4 Jamea Jackson #91 Match data Aug 26, 2005* R16 New Haven Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,906 218 196 52.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jamea Jackson #382 #43 479 1,662 33 50 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jie Zheng Jamea Jackson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2003 0–1 0.0% #444 1,491 0 0
17 2004 2–5 28.6% #156 1,482 0 0
18 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,506 0 0 2005 10–14 41.7% #80 1,520 0 0
19 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0 2006 19–19 50.0% #45 1,608 0 0
20 2004 10–18 35.7% #79 1,546 0 0 2007 0–6 0.0% #588 1,539 0 0
21 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,702 0 1 2008 2–5 28.6% #273 1,529 0 0
22 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,777 0 3
23 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3
24 2008 22–11 66.7% #25 1,845 0 3
25 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,782 0 3
26 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,762 0 3
27 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3
28 2012 25–24 51.0% #26 1,652 0 4
29 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,687 0 4
30 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4
31 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jie Zheng Jamea Jackson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2003 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2004 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2002 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
19 2003 5 7 12 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 11 13 24 45.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0%
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 2008 2 5 7 28.6%
22 2006 12 9 21 57.1% 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 1 6 83.3%
25 2009 19 13 32 59.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 2010 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2011 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2012 17 15 32 53.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0%
29 2013 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2015 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 143 126 269 53.2% 48 44 92 52.2% 24 22 46 52.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 20 37 57 35.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 286/397 of Jie Zheng's and 40/82 of Jamea Jackson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jie Zheng Jamea Jackson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 —/— 2004 1/7 0.0 4.0 64.0% 53.8% 44.4% 50.0% 36.8% 50.4% 44.2%
18 —/— 2005 9/24 1.1 2.4 66.3% 62.4% 42.0% 56.2% 56.0% 55.5% 45.3%
19 —/— 2006 20/38 0.7 3.1 66.5% 58.3% 48.9% 47.6% 44.4% 55.1% 45.1%
20 2004 5/28 0.2 3.2 67.1% 53.1% 34.7% 39.7% 34.3% 47.4% 39.7% 2007 5/6 0.4 4.0 62.9% 45.0% 40.0% 37.7% 28.9% 43.7% 32.8%
21 2005 3/39 0.3 1.7 73.6% 54.5% 45.8% 58.2% 43.9% 52.9% 38.8% 2008 5/7 1.2 4.4 62.5% 52.0% 37.3% 43.7% 55.6% 46.8% 40.2%
22 2006 24/41 0.5 2.0 72.3% 57.7% 47.0% 48.1% 46.4% 54.3% 46.5% —/—
23 2007 16/17 0.5 1.8 71.3% 62.6% 45.3% 56.9% 44.4% 57.9% 45.5% —/—
24 2008 24/33 1.2 2.0 64.9% 62.6% 48.5% 56.7% 50.6% 57.3% 47.3% —/—
25 2009 44/48 0.6 2.2 70.2% 61.5% 47.3% 51.4% 52.7% 57.3% 45.8% —/—
26 2010 39/41 0.5 2.8 69.7% 57.6% 43.9% 55.1% 47.7% 53.4% 45.3% —/—
27 2011 36/41 0.3 2.5 73.5% 57.0% 40.0% 48.0% 48.8% 52.5% 42.9% —/—
28 2012 38/49 0.5 2.4 68.6% 60.5% 46.7% 49.0% 51.9% 56.3% 44.8% —/—
29 2013 33/34 0.4 2.7 70.4% 56.4% 44.3% 47.0% 46.9% 52.9% 44.4% —/—
30 2014 23/25 0.3 2.0 70.5% 57.6% 42.9% 53.2% 57.7% 53.1% 44.0% —/—
31 2015 1/1 0.0 3.0 64.7% 48.5% 27.8% 61.5% 14.3% 41.2% 37.9% —/—
Career 286/414 0.5 2.3 70.1% 58.9% 44.8% 51.2% 49.4% 54.7% 44.9% 40/83 0.8 3.2 65.5% 56.7% 44.7% 47.9% 46.3% 52.6% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jie Zheng Jamea Jackson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2003 1492 100.0 0.0% -3.50 -0.13
17 2004 1483 106.1 -0.74 -0.28 0.892 47.5% -1 46.7% -0.07 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) -0.03
18 2002 1507 104.9 40.0% -0.60 1–0 1–1 +0.03 2005 1521 117.6 -0.08 -0.13 1.020 50.4% -39 +118 43.6% -0.38 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.8 -0.78
19 2003 1536 113.8 +24 51.6% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 1–0 +0.41 2006 1609 128.7 -0.56 +0.41 1.005 50.0% -63 -80 +192 53.5% +0.27 6–8 (43%) 3–8 (27%) 98.3 +0.35
20 2004 1547 127.3 -2.88 -1.53 0.755 43.6% +22 +39 -34 39.7% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 2–0 +0.21 2007 1540 95.2 -4.69 -3.50 0.583 38.5% -33 7.7% -3.54 0–1 -0.44
21 2005 1702 131.1 -0.46 -1.44 0.823 45.8% -19 -40 55.4% +0.42 11–5 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 107.3 -0.22 2008 1530 101.3 -3.99 -0.29 0.755 43.5% -25 28.6% -2.21 0–2 1–0 -0.20
22 2006 1778 132.0 -1.03 +1.40 1.019 50.5% -50 -22 -207 58.9% +0.37 7–8 (47%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 -0.42
23 2007 1690 124.7 +1.30 +1.45 1.082 51.4% -13 +33 45.9% -0.08 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.7 -0.24
24 2008 1845 147.4 +1.86 +3.35 1.109 52.4% -68 -101 -119 59.7% +1.01 7–1 (88%) 2–3 (40%) 107.4 -2.42
25 2009 1782 142.7 +1.41 +2.49 1.073 51.6% +25 -47 -70 54.5% +0.39 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) 104.2 -0.17
26 2010 1763 139.6 -1.89 +1.53 0.971 49.4% +49 -45 -75 52.6% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 7–0 (100%) 106.1 +0.54
27 2011 1705 120.3 -2.95 -0.51 0.903 47.7% +56 -98 -88 43.9% -0.58 9–9 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.59
28 2012 1653 131.5 +0.57 +1.44 1.024 50.6% +36 -75 +52 49.5% -0.10 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.4 -0.25
29 2013 1688 126.6 -2.38 +0.84 0.941 48.5% -1 -50 47.5% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 107.5 +0.29
30 2014 1670 119.0 -1.86 +0.63 0.939 48.7% -33 -52 +57 46.2% -0.42 2–2 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.8 -0.53
31 2015 1648 95.9 -0.62 -1.23 0.644 39.3% 0.0% -4.50 +0.16
Career 1906 137.9 -0.68 +1.30 0.991 49.8% +7 -35 -39 50.9% +0.03 73–58 (56%) 47–31 (60%) 109.8 -0.49 1662 120.0 -1.40 -0.31 0.907 47.8% -44 -80 +164 44.3% -0.45 9–18 (33%) 8–12 (40%) 96.4 -1.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.