Jie Zheng
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 10 | 11 | Mar 20, 2013 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 1 | 7 | 8 | May 8, 2013 | H2H |
| Na Li | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 8, 2014 | H2H |
| Maria Kirilenko | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 2, 2013 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 4 | 2 | 6 | May 24, 2013 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Jie Zheng holds a 2–1 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jie Zheng leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2009 Monterrey Open second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jie Zheng | 6-3 6-4 | Melinda Czink | Match data | Mar 6, 2009* | R16 | Monterrey Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Jie Zheng | 7-6(0) 5-7 6-3 | Melinda Czink | Match data | Jan 22, 2009* | R64 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Melinda Czink | 6-0 6-2 | Jie Zheng | Match data | Feb 9, 2006* | R32 | Pattaya | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,906 | 218 | 196 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Melinda Czink | #691 | #37 | 1,571 | 1,796 | 89 | 137 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Melinda Czink | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #128 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #105 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #106 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #312 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2012 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #26 | 1,652 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,687 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #94 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #254 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Melinda Czink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2002 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2003 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2005 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2006 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 143 | 126 | 269 | 53.2% | 48 | 44 | 92 | 52.2% | 24 | 22 | 46 | 52.2% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | 56 | 77 | 133 | 42.1% | 22 | 44 | 66 | 33.3% | 11 | 16 | 27 | 40.7% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 286/397 of Jie Zheng's and 143/226 of Melinda Czink's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Melinda Czink | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 2004 | 5/28 | 0.2 | 3.2 | 67.1% | 53.1% | 34.7% | 39.7% | 34.3% | 47.4% | 39.7% | 2003 | 3/7 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 65.3% | 58.7% | 40.7% | 45.8% | 31.9% | 52.1% | 41.9% |
| 21 | 2005 | 3/39 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 73.6% | 54.5% | 45.8% | 58.2% | 43.9% | 52.9% | 38.8% | 2004 | 4/18 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 70.2% | 54.4% | 42.8% | 39.0% | 56.8% | 50.8% | 44.0% |
| 22 | 2006 | 24/41 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 72.3% | 57.7% | 47.0% | 48.1% | 46.4% | 54.3% | 46.5% | 2005 | 1/21 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 71.4% | 54.3% | 28.6% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 46.9% | 29.6% |
| 23 | 2007 | 16/17 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 71.3% | 62.6% | 45.3% | 56.9% | 44.4% | 57.9% | 45.5% | 2006 | 6/32 | 2.0 | 3.3 | 71.5% | 59.4% | 46.2% | 60.2% | 50.6% | 55.2% | 42.5% |
| 24 | 2008 | 24/33 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 64.9% | 62.6% | 48.5% | 56.7% | 50.6% | 57.3% | 47.3% | 2007 | 4/12 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 62.6% | 62.1% | 45.1% | 40.4% | 36.1% | 55.8% | 36.3% |
| 25 | 2009 | 44/48 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 70.2% | 61.5% | 47.3% | 51.4% | 52.7% | 57.3% | 45.8% | 2008 | 16/21 | 2.8 | 5.2 | 62.8% | 66.0% | 42.4% | 50.4% | 55.5% | 57.1% | 39.5% |
| 26 | 2010 | 39/41 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 69.7% | 57.6% | 43.9% | 55.1% | 47.7% | 53.4% | 45.3% | 2009 | 44/50 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 61.7% | 64.9% | 47.8% | 49.9% | 51.8% | 58.1% | 42.7% |
| 27 | 2011 | 36/41 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 73.5% | 57.0% | 40.0% | 48.0% | 48.8% | 52.5% | 42.9% | 2010 | 19/19 | 2.8 | 6.3 | 61.0% | 61.3% | 39.9% | 46.1% | 28.6% | 52.9% | 38.0% |
| 28 | 2012 | 38/49 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 68.6% | 60.5% | 46.7% | 49.0% | 51.9% | 56.3% | 44.8% | 2011 | 9/9 | 2.3 | 6.8 | 61.8% | 61.7% | 47.4% | 43.6% | 45.3% | 56.0% | 40.8% |
| 29 | 2013 | 33/34 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 70.4% | 56.4% | 44.3% | 47.0% | 46.9% | 52.9% | 44.4% | 2012 | 25/25 | 2.7 | 4.2 | 59.6% | 64.5% | 48.9% | 53.6% | 46.3% | 58.1% | 39.5% |
| 30 | 2014 | 23/25 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 70.5% | 57.6% | 42.9% | 53.2% | 57.7% | 53.1% | 44.0% | 2013 | 12/12 | 3.3 | 4.7 | 62.4% | 63.3% | 40.1% | 50.6% | 43.7% | 54.8% | 36.9% |
| 31 | 2015 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 64.7% | 48.5% | 27.8% | 61.5% | 14.3% | 41.2% | 37.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 286/414 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 70.1% | 58.9% | 44.8% | 51.2% | 49.4% | 54.7% | 44.9% | — | 143/226 | 2.8 | 5.0 | 62.2% | 63.3% | 45.1% | 49.5% | 46.6% | 56.3% | 40.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Melinda Czink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2002 | 1507 | 104.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 1536 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | — | 51.6% | +0.06 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 1547 | 127.3 | -2.88 | -1.53 | 0.755 | 43.6% | +22 | +39 | -34 | 39.7% | -0.48 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–0 | — | +0.21 | 2003 | 1568 | 119.7 | -0.23 | +0.05 | 0.875 | 46.6% | +6 | -6 | — | 44.4% | -0.50 | 4–0 (100%) | 1–0 | — | -0.33 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1702 | 131.1 | -0.46 | -1.44 | 0.823 | 45.8% | -19 | -40 | — | 55.4% | +0.42 | 11–5 (69%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | -0.22 | 2004 | 1428 | 98.7 | -0.95 | -0.17 | 0.894 | 47.4% | +79 | +17 | — | 21.4% | -2.07 | 1–5 (17%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.23 |
| 22 | 2006 | 1778 | 132.0 | -1.03 | +1.40 | 1.019 | 50.5% | -50 | -22 | -207 | 58.9% | +0.37 | 7–8 (47%) | 8–3 (73%) | — | -0.42 | 2005 | 1478 | 105.8 | -1.18 | -2.27 | 0.558 | 37.9% | +88 | -105 | — | 41.7% | -0.67 | 4–2 (67%) | 4–2 (67%) | — | +0.54 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1690 | 124.7 | +1.30 | +1.45 | 1.082 | 51.4% | -13 | +33 | — | 45.9% | -0.08 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.24 | 2006 | 1501 | 112.0 | -1.09 | -1.39 | 0.950 | 49.1% | +30 | -48 | +15 | 45.9% | -0.36 | 6–6 (50%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | +1.02 |
| 24 | 2008 | 1845 | 147.4 | +1.86 | +3.35 | 1.109 | 52.4% | -68 | -101 | -119 | 59.7% | +1.01 | 7–1 (88%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | -2.42 | 2007 | 1457 | 101.5 | -0.83 | -2.90 | 0.821 | 45.7% | +57 | -51 | — | 31.0% | -1.10 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–4 (20%) | — | +0.11 |
| 25 | 2009 | 1782 | 142.7 | +1.41 | +2.49 | 1.073 | 51.6% | +25 | -47 | -70 | 54.5% | +0.39 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | -0.17 | 2008 | 1559 | 122.7 | +0.81 | -3.19 | 0.920 | 48.5% | +7 | -110 | -18 | 47.9% | -0.21 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.10 |
| 26 | 2010 | 1763 | 139.6 | -1.89 | +1.53 | 0.971 | 49.4% | +49 | -45 | -75 | 52.6% | -0.01 | 9–6 (60%) | 7–0 (100%) | — | +0.54 | 2009 | 1759 | 133.3 | +2.15 | -0.64 | 1.020 | 50.5% | -34 | -162 | -152 | 58.7% | +0.35 | 9–10 (47%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | -0.55 |
| 27 | 2011 | 1705 | 120.3 | -2.95 | -0.51 | 0.903 | 47.7% | +56 | -98 | -88 | 43.9% | -0.58 | 9–9 (50%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | +0.59 | 2010 | 1533 | 110.0 | -1.99 | -4.02 | 0.807 | 45.6% | +115 | -53 | +11 | 23.3% | -1.44 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–5 (29%) | — | -0.52 |
| 28 | 2012 | 1653 | 131.5 | +0.57 | +1.44 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +36 | -75 | +52 | 49.5% | -0.10 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | -0.25 | 2011 | 1526 | 106.8 | +0.76 | +0.06 | 0.926 | 48.6% | +77 | — | +41 | 40.9% | -0.68 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.11 |
| 29 | 2013 | 1688 | 126.6 | -2.38 | +0.84 | 0.941 | 48.5% | -1 | -50 | — | 47.5% | -0.36 | 8–4 (67%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | +0.29 | 2012 | 1544 | 120.7 | +2.01 | -3.55 | 0.942 | 49.0% | +9 | -66 | +104 | 40.7% | -0.48 | 3–6 (33%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | -0.29 |
| 30 | 2014 | 1670 | 119.0 | -1.86 | +0.63 | 0.939 | 48.7% | -33 | -52 | +57 | 46.2% | -0.42 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–1 (83%) | — | -0.53 | 2013 | 1500 | 108.6 | -0.99 | -4.61 | 0.816 | 46.1% | +48 | -61 | — | 30.0% | -1.37 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | — | -0.51 |
| 31 | 2015 | 1648 | 95.9 | -0.62 | -1.23 | 0.644 | 39.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1906 | 137.9 | -0.68 | +1.30 | 0.991 | 49.8% | +7 | -35 | -39 | 50.9% | +0.03 | 73–58 (56%) | 47–31 (60%) | 109.8 | -0.49 | — | 1796 | 120.5 | +0.70 | -2.25 | 0.922 | 48.4% | +30 | -76 | -4 | 42.0% | -0.58 | 39–45 (46%) | 29–32 (48%) | 99.0 | -0.24 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 10 | 11 | Mar 20, 2013 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 1 | 7 | 8 | May 8, 2013 | H2H |
| Na Li | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 8, 2014 | H2H |
| Maria Kirilenko | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 2, 2013 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 4 | 2 | 6 | May 24, 2013 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jan 13, 2009 | H2H |
| Sabine Lisicki | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 22, 2013 | H2H |
| Ana Ivanovic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 16, 2013 | H2H |
| Vania King | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jan 5, 2012 | H2H |
| Alona Bondarenko | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jan 7, 2009 | H2H |