H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jie Zheng vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 1-9

Nadia Petrova holds a 9–1 lead over Jie Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 6–1 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2013 Miami second round 6-3 6-1.

CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 9
10 main draw meetings
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 20, 2013* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #12 6-3 6-1 Jie Zheng #44 Match data
Oct 29, 2012 Tournament of Champions WTA Finals RR Hard Nadia Petrova #13 6-3 6-3 Jie Zheng #29 Match data
Sep 6, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #13 6-4 6-1 Jie Zheng #22 Match data
Apr 30, 2009* Stuttgart WTA 500 R32 Clay Nadia Petrova #10 6-4 5-7 6-4 Jie Zheng #16 Match data
Mar 26, 2008* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Jie Zheng #174 2-1 (ret.) Nadia Petrova #17 Match data
Apr 6, 2007* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Nadia Petrova #7 6-2 6-3 Jie Zheng #41 Match data
May 12, 2006* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Nadia Petrova #4 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 Jie Zheng #44 Match data
Jan 6, 2005* Gold Coast WTA 500 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #12 6-2 6-3 Jie Zheng #79 Match data
Sep 23, 2004* Beijing WTA 500 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #13 6-2 6-2 Jie Zheng #62 Match data
Sep 1, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nadia Petrova #14 6-0 6-1 Jie Zheng #60 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,898 216 193 52.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jie Zheng Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,507 0 0 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2004 10–17 37.0% #79 1,551 0 0 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,705 0 1 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,778 0 3 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2008 20–10 66.7% #25 1,838 0 3 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,779 0 3 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,760 0 3 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2012 25–23 52.1% #26 1,658 0 4 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,688 0 4 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13