H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jie Zheng vs Sofia Arvidsson H2H: 0-2
Sofia Arvidsson holds a 2–0 lead over Jie Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sofia Arvidsson leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sofia Arvidsson won the 2012 Tournament of Champions round-robin match 5-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2012 | Tournament of Champions | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Sofia Arvidsson | 5-1 (ret.) | Jie Zheng | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2011* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Sofia Arvidsson | 6-3 6-2 | Jie Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Sofia Arvidsson | #320 | #29 | 1,380 | 1,775 | 113 | 154 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Sofia Arvidsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #67 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #98 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #78 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #41 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #120 | 1,597 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #320 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |