H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jie Zheng vs Tatiana Golovin H2H: 1-1
Jie Zheng and Tatiana Golovin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jie Zheng leads 1–0 on clay, while Tatiana Golovin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2006 Roland Garros first round 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2006* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jie Zheng | 6-3 7-6(5) | Tatiana Golovin | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2006* | Miami | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Tatiana Golovin | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Jie Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Tatiana Golovin | #1,128 | #12 | 1,882 | 2,012 | 131 | 80 | 62.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Tatiana Golovin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #358 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #13 | 1,981 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #254 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |