H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jie Zheng vs Urszula Radwanska H2H: 2-0

Jie Zheng holds a 2–0 lead over Urszula Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jie Zheng leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2013 Dubai Tennis Championships round of 32 6-2 2-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jie Zheng
CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Urszula Radwanska
Poland Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jie Zheng #44 6-2 2-6 7-5 Urszula Radwanska #37 Match data Feb 21, 2013* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Jie Zheng #18 6-3 6-3 Urszula Radwanska #107 Match data Mar 5, 2009* R32 Monterrey Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,906 218 196 52.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Urszula Radwanska #493 #29 1,565 1,746 100 131 43.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jie Zheng Urszula Radwanska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #313 1,525 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2007 3–3 50.0% #252 1,539 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2008 3–6 33.3% #129 1,516 0 0
18 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,506 0 0 2009 16–22 42.1% #70 1,555 0 0
19 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0 2010 1–3 25.0% #193 1,551 0 0
20 2004 10–18 35.7% #79 1,546 0 0 2011 10–11 47.6% #105 1,575 0 0
21 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,702 0 1 2012 27–25 51.9% #31 1,710 0 0
22 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,777 0 3 2013 21–23 47.7% #40 1,700 0 0
23 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3 2014 3–11 21.4% #179 1,594 0 0
24 2008 22–11 66.7% #25 1,845 0 3 2015 12–15 44.4% #94 1,579 0 0
25 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,782 0 3 2016 2–5 28.6% #257 1,531 0 0
26 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,762 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 2012 25–24 51.0% #26 1,652 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,687 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4 2021 0–4 0.0% #231 1,452 0 0
31 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jie Zheng Urszula Radwanska
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
19 2003 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2010 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — 2012 17 17 34 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
22 2006 12 9 21 57.1% 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2015 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2009 19 13 32 59.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2016 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 17 15 32 53.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2021 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143 126 269 53.2% 48 44 92 52.2% 24 22 46 52.2% 3 4 7 42.9% — 75 91 166 45.2% 9 23 32 28.1% 16 16 32 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 286/397 of Jie Zheng's and 200/226 of Urszula Radwanska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jie Zheng Urszula Radwanska
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/6 1.5 3.8 64.3% 55.8% 45.7% 50.0% 48.7% 52.4% 48.0%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 4/9 1.3 3.5 59.3% 56.9% 33.2% 47.1% 47.8% 47.0% 42.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 34/38 2.2 2.6 61.6% 60.4% 41.4% 49.8% 45.7% 53.2% 43.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 3/4 0.7 1.3 63.0% 52.2% 49.3% 55.6% 33.3% 51.5% 40.4%
20 2004 5/28 0.2 3.2 67.1% 53.1% 34.7% 39.7% 34.3% 47.4% 39.7% 2011 18/21 1.7 2.4 63.9% 59.7% 46.4% 47.9% 46.4% 54.8% 46.5%
21 2005 3/39 0.3 1.7 73.6% 54.5% 45.8% 58.2% 43.9% 52.9% 38.8% 2012 49/52 2.0 2.4 65.4% 60.6% 42.6% 50.7% 48.2% 54.2% 45.3%
22 2006 24/41 0.5 2.0 72.3% 57.7% 47.0% 48.1% 46.4% 54.3% 46.5% 2013 42/44 1.6 2.1 66.3% 56.2% 43.8% 49.5% 50.6% 52.1% 45.3%
23 2007 16/17 0.5 1.8 71.3% 62.6% 45.3% 56.9% 44.4% 57.9% 45.5% 2014 14/14 0.8 2.9 62.6% 54.9% 41.5% 37.6% 52.7% 49.8% 43.6%
24 2008 24/33 1.2 2.0 64.9% 62.6% 48.5% 56.7% 50.6% 57.3% 47.3% 2015 21/27 1.6 2.5 67.3% 57.1% 45.4% 46.9% 51.4% 52.9% 43.0%
25 2009 44/48 0.6 2.2 70.2% 61.5% 47.3% 51.4% 52.7% 57.3% 45.8% 2016 7/7 1.3 4.1 58.3% 52.7% 49.6% 30.9% 43.8% 51.8% 45.2%
26 2010 39/41 0.5 2.8 69.7% 57.6% 43.9% 55.1% 47.7% 53.4% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 36/41 0.3 2.5 73.5% 57.0% 40.0% 48.0% 48.8% 52.5% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 38/49 0.5 2.4 68.6% 60.5% 46.7% 49.0% 51.9% 56.3% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 33/34 0.4 2.7 70.4% 56.4% 44.3% 47.0% 46.9% 52.9% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 23/25 0.3 2.0 70.5% 57.6% 42.9% 53.2% 57.7% 53.1% 44.0% 2021 4/4 1.8 4.3 60.3% 51.2% 47.7% 51.6% 26.2% 49.9% 33.4%
31 2015 1/1 0.0 3.0 64.7% 48.5% 27.8% 61.5% 14.3% 41.2% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 286/414 0.5 2.3 70.1% 58.9% 44.8% 51.2% 49.4% 54.7% 44.9% — 200/231 1.7 2.5 64.3% 58.0% 43.5% 48.0% 48.0% 52.8% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jie Zheng Urszula Radwanska
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1525 115.3 — — — — — +24 — 40.0% -0.70 — 0–1 — -0.64
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1539 110.6 -1.56 -0.20 1.009 50.0% +22 — — 57.1% +0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.39
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1517 107.6 -2.91 -0.90 0.806 45.0% +3 — — 40.0% -0.45 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.54
18 2002 1507 104.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 1–1 — +0.03 2009 1555 121.6 -1.78 -0.41 0.921 48.0% -11 -56 +108 42.5% -0.65 6–4 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 108.8 +0.15
19 2003 1536 113.8 — — — — +24 — — 51.6% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.41 2010 1552 113.9 +0.83 +2.32 0.833 46.6% -5 — — 25.0% -2.13 — — — -0.32
20 2004 1547 127.3 -2.88 -1.53 0.755 43.6% +22 +39 -34 39.7% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 2–0 — +0.21 2011 1575 116.1 -1.08 +0.22 1.028 50.6% +16 -91 — 48.1% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.3 +1.19
21 2005 1702 131.1 -0.46 -1.44 0.823 45.8% -19 -40 — 55.4% +0.42 11–5 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 107.3 -0.22 2012 1710 130.1 -1.38 +2.06 0.990 49.6% -35 -192 -2 49.1% -0.05 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.60
22 2006 1778 132.0 -1.03 +1.40 1.019 50.5% -50 -22 -207 58.9% +0.37 7–8 (47%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 -0.42 2013 1700 138.3 -2.18 +1.30 0.945 48.6% +10 -144 -15 44.9% -0.39 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 111.9 -1.35
23 2007 1690 124.7 +1.30 +1.45 1.082 51.4% -13 +33 — 45.9% -0.08 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.7 -0.24 2014 1595 109.0 -3.72 -0.43 0.869 47.1% +59 -95 — 25.9% -1.56 0–3 (0%) — — -1.04
24 2008 1845 147.4 +1.86 +3.35 1.109 52.4% -68 -101 -119 59.7% +1.01 7–1 (88%) 2–3 (40%) 107.4 -2.42 2015 1579 115.7 -3.71 +0.71 0.914 47.8% +43 — +45 45.0% -0.53 5–3 (63%) 3–2 (60%) 102.8 -0.35
25 2009 1782 142.7 +1.41 +2.49 1.073 51.6% +25 -47 -70 54.5% +0.39 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) 104.2 -0.17 2016 1532 111.4 -0.85 +0.76 0.939 48.4% +53 — — 42.9% -0.07 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.48
26 2010 1763 139.6 -1.89 +1.53 0.971 49.4% +49 -45 -75 52.6% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 7–0 (100%) 106.1 +0.54 2017 1519 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 1705 120.3 -2.95 -0.51 0.903 47.7% +56 -98 -88 43.9% -0.58 9–9 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.59 2018 1506 100.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 1653 131.5 +0.57 +1.44 1.024 50.6% +36 -75 +52 49.5% -0.10 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.4 -0.25 2019 1484 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1688 126.6 -2.38 +0.84 0.941 48.5% -1 -50 — 47.5% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 107.5 +0.29 2020 1466 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 1670 119.0 -1.86 +0.63 0.939 48.7% -33 -52 +57 46.2% -0.42 2–2 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.8 -0.53 2021 1453 105.6 -1.63 -4.19 0.666 42.3% +42 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.17
31 2015 1648 95.9 -0.62 -1.23 0.644 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.16 2022 1441 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1428 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1441 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1426 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1432 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1906 137.9 -0.68 +1.30 0.991 49.8% +7 -35 -39 50.9% +0.03 73–58 (56%) 47–31 (60%) 109.8 -0.49 — 1747 127.6 -1.98 +0.73 0.940 48.6% +7 -111 +29 43.8% -0.43 31–31 (50%) 25–20 (56%) 106.1 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.