H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Anastasia Myskina H2H: 0-1

Anastasia Myskina holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Myskina leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anastasia Myskina won the 2006 Eastbourne Open round of 16 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Anastasia Myskina
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasia Myskina #11 6-4 6-4 Jill Craybas #45 Match data Jun 23, 2006* R16 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Anastasia Myskina #1,101 #2 4,247 2,078 240 141 63.0% 1 2 0 3 4 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Anastasia Myskina
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 10–6 62.5% #65 1,620 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 2000 16–18 47.1% #58 1,659 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2001 11–13 45.8% #59 1,716 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2002 46–27 63.0% #11 1,883 0 2
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 2003 42–21 66.7% #7 1,957 0 6
22 — — — — — — — 2004 49–18 73.1% #3 2,043 1 9
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 2005 35–18 66.0% #14 1,935 1 10
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2006 31–18 63.3% #16 1,821 1 10
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #1043 1,772 1 10
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Craybas Anastasia Myskina
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 4 8 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 5 8 13 38.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 21 15 36 58.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 21 13 34 61.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 0 8 100.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 32 14 46 69.6% 11 3 14 78.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 27 11 38 71.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 13 11 24 54.2% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — 125 82 207 60.4% 53 36 89 59.6% 36 15 51 70.6% 26 8 34 76.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Craybas Anastasia Myskina
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1620 127.2 — — — — -30 +8 — 59.0% +0.67 4–3 (57%) 3–1 (75%) 104.6 +0.32
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1659 127.5 — — — — -67 -8 +28 48.8% -0.29 7–9 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 101.4 -0.66
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1716 138.4 — — — — -38 -105 +14 51.9% +0.04 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 103.5 -0.91
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1884 149.1 — — — — -69 -141 +13 57.4% +0.59 21–9 (70%) 10–9 (53%) 109.4 -2.10
21 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11 2003 1958 153.9 +0.52 +3.26 1.066 52.0% -6 -162 -52 61.5% +0.76 12–7 (63%) 6–1 (86%) 107.0 -0.46
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2044 167.4 +2.89 +5.17 1.223 54.7% -6 -77 -143 67.7% +1.35 16–9 (64%) 6–6 (50%) 100.6 -2.19
23 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19 2005 1935 144.8 +0.74 +3.08 1.103 52.3% +52 -92 -21 58.7% +0.82 14–7 (67%) 6–9 (40%) 98.5 +2.09
24 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12 2006 1821 138.4 -0.60 +2.50 1.023 50.6% -7 +27 +205 62.5% +0.63 6–8 (43%) 10–5 (67%) 96.2 -0.39
25 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 2007 1772 94.1 -4.25 -1.94 0.614 39.1% — — — 20.0% -3.80 0–1 1–0 — +0.01
26 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80 — 2078 153.4 +0.42 +3.14 1.067 51.6% -14 -79 +33 59.4% +0.65 84–59 (59%) 49–33 (60%) 108.0 -1.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.