H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Eleni Daniilidou H2H: 2-3

Eleni Daniilidou holds a 3–2 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Eleni Daniilidou leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2011 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-3.

USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
GRE Age 43 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 24, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Jill Craybas #104 6-3 6-3 Eleni Daniilidou #153 Match data
Mar 9, 2010* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R128 Hard Jill Craybas #83 6-0 7-5 Eleni Daniilidou #191 Match data
Aug 1, 2007* San Diego WTA 1000 R64 Hard Eleni Daniilidou #44 6-4 6-4 Jill Craybas #72 Match data
Oct 28, 2004* Luxembourg WTA 250 R32 Hard Eleni Daniilidou #34 7-5 6-1 Jill Craybas #58 Match data
Mar 21, 2003* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Eleni Daniilidou #15 6-4 6-3 Jill Craybas #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Eleni Daniilidou #1,070 #14 1,639 1,878 185 203 47.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Eleni Daniilidou
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2001 5–8 38.5% #81 1,506 0 0
19 2002 32–22 59.3% #22 1,778 0 1
20 2003 32–24 57.1% #26 1,706 0 2
21 1996 0–1 0.0% 1,488 0 0 2004 21–19 52.5% #34 1,683 0 3
22 2005 14–20 41.2% #69 1,638 0 3
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 2006 27–24 52.9% #36 1,720 0 4
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2007 27–29 48.2% #42 1,720 0 4
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2008 8–8 50.0% #144 1,700 0 5
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #157 1,677 0 5
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2010 2–3 40.0% #165 1,666 0 5
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2011 6–12 33.3% #90 1,566 0 5
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1 2012 8–21 27.6% #100 1,483 0 5
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1 2013 3–10 23.1% #186 1,431 0 5
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1 2014 0–2 0.0% #414 1,412 0 5
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1