H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Eleni Daniilidou H2H: 2-3

Eleni Daniilidou holds a 3–2 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Eleni Daniilidou leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2011 Roland Garros round of 128 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main-draw meetings
Eleni Daniilidou
GRE Age 43 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jill Craybas #104 6-3 6-3 Eleni Daniilidou #153 Match data May 24, 2011* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jill Craybas #83 6-0 7-5 Eleni Daniilidou #191 Match data Mar 12, 2010* R128 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Eleni Daniilidou #44 6-4 6-4 Jill Craybas #72 Match data Aug 1, 2007* R64 San Diego Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Eleni Daniilidou #34 7-5 6-1 Jill Craybas #58 Match data Oct 28, 2004* R32 Luxembourg Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Eleni Daniilidou #15 6-4 6-3 Jill Craybas #58 Match data Mar 21, 2003* R64 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Eleni Daniilidou #1,070 #14 1,639 1,878 187 206 47.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Eleni Daniilidou
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #314 1,490 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2001 5–8 38.5% #81 1,499 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2002 32–22 59.3% #22 1,778 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2003 32–24 57.1% #26 1,706 0 2
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 2004 23–20 53.5% #34 1,716 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 2005 14–20 41.2% #69 1,648 0 3
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 2006 27–24 52.9% #36 1,722 0 4
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2007 27–29 48.2% #42 1,720 0 4
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2008 8–9 47.1% #144 1,667 0 5
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #157 1,646 0 5
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2010 2–3 40.0% #165 1,640 0 5
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2011 6–12 33.3% #90 1,553 0 5
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1 2012 8–21 27.6% #100 1,479 0 5
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1 2013 3–10 23.1% #186 1,427 0 5
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1 2014 0–2 0.0% #414 1,409 0 5
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Craybas Eleni Daniilidou
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 14 11 25 56.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 17 13 30 56.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 21 12 33 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 20 15 35 57.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 19 18 37 51.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 7 13 20 35.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — 124 127 251 49.4% 26 46 72 36.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 6 9 15 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 212/350 of Jill Craybas's and 168/325 of Eleni Daniilidou's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jill Craybas Eleni Daniilidou
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 6/56 1.3 5.2 66.6% 63.7% 40.6% 60.1% 43.4% 55.8% 44.2%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 8/43 1.8 5.9 69.5% 64.1% 42.1% 62.4% 44.6% 57.6% 47.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 9/34 1.3 5.6 65.2% 58.9% 42.6% 44.5% 44.1% 52.2% 43.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 19/51 0.8 5.1 69.1% 60.0% 46.4% 42.5% 48.0% 56.0% 46.7%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 51/56 0.7 5.7 69.8% 59.2% 38.2% 50.7% 51.7% 52.8% 44.3%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 14/17 1.2 4.9 64.4% 57.6% 32.9% 33.2% 66.8% 48.9% 42.0%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 1.0 2.0 61.6% 49.1% 48.5% 27.3% 66.7% 48.8% 46.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 5/5 1.6 5.6 63.1% 59.9% 46.5% 49.4% 39.8% 54.8% 42.1%
28 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2% 2011 16/18 0.8 5.9 64.1% 59.1% 41.2% 46.5% 45.1% 52.4% 44.0%
29 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5% 2012 26/29 1.5 5.7 64.5% 58.1% 41.4% 45.5% 40.1% 52.2% 39.0%
30 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6% 2013 11/13 1.6 8.9 65.2% 59.8% 31.4% 48.6% 32.2% 49.8% 39.0%
31 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2% 2014 2/2 0.0 6.5 71.6% 53.6% 16.9% 27.3% 41.7% 43.1% 38.2%
32 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2% — 168/393 1.1 5.8 67.0% 59.3% 39.6% 47.1% 47.4% 52.7% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Craybas Eleni Daniilidou
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1491 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.02
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1500 107.9 — — — — +36 -22 +106 40.0% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.52
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1778 141.4 — — — — -106 -221 +113 58.6% +0.69 9–11 (45%) 5–6 (45%) 100.1 -1.37
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1706 136.7 +0.41 +0.45 1.001 50.0% +5 -93 +150 56.7% +0.20 7–8 (47%) 10–2 (83%) 102.0 +1.38
21 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11 2004 1717 141.0 +1.29 +1.68 1.128 52.6% +42 -116 — 55.9% +0.45 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 101.4 +1.59
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1648 126.9 -1.18 +0.37 0.906 47.8% +10 -104 +191 44.2% -0.49 7–6 (54%) 3–5 (38%) 97.5 -2.10
23 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19 2006 1723 136.1 +0.35 +1.65 1.061 51.1% +25 -187 +90 54.0% +0.18 8–9 (47%) 3–4 (43%) 97.2 -2.71
24 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12 2007 1720 130.6 -2.20 +0.32 0.938 48.6% +11 -224 +88 47.2% -0.16 13–10 (57%) 9–6 (60%) 104.4 +0.19
25 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 2008 1668 121.0 -3.18 -0.53 0.821 46.1% -1 — — 46.7% -0.50 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.67
26 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19 2009 1647 100.7 +1.13 +0.09 0.915 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.05
27 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70 2010 1641 109.4 -1.18 -1.96 0.933 48.3% +16 — — 40.0% -0.70 — 1–0 — -0.22
28 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02 2011 1554 103.4 -2.59 +0.59 0.925 48.1% +34 -96 — 38.1% -0.95 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 98.9 +0.84
29 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31 2012 1479 112.0 -2.35 -3.57 0.817 45.6% +54 -42 +181 33.3% -1.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.19
30 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12 2013 1428 100.8 -3.67 -2.11 0.776 44.5% +39 — — 28.1% -1.81 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.45
31 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78 2014 1409 94.6 -1.70 -2.31 0.671 40.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.03
32 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80 — 1878 134.3 -1.78 -0.36 0.913 48.0% +9 -146 +126 48.9% -0.13 64–65 (50%) 44–34 (56%) 102.2 -0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.