H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Jana Nejedly H2H: 2-0

Jill Craybas holds a 2–0 lead over Jana Nejedly in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jill Craybas leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2002 Waikoloa round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Jana Nejedly
CAN Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jill Craybas #77 6-3 6-3 Jana Nejedly #178 Match data Sep 13, 2002* R32 Waikoloa Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Jill Craybas #115 2-6 6-3 7-5 Jana Nejedly #99 Match data Jan 9, 2002* R32 Canberra Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jana Nejedly #914 #64 488 1,625 49 105 31.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Jana Nejedly
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1993 0–3 0.0% #328 1,462 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1994 3–9 25.0% #139 1,467 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1995 11–12 47.8% #82 1,580 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1996 3–9 25.0% #130 1,552 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 1997 0–2 0.0% #137 1,541 0 0
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 1998 4–9 30.8% #75 1,556 0 0
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 1999 5–13 27.8% #88 1,496 0 0
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2000 12–20 37.5% #69 1,528 0 0
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2001 8–17 32.0% #96 1,520 0 0
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2002 3–11 21.4% #233 1,423 0 0
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Craybas Jana Nejedly
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2001 4 9 13 30.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — 31 58 89 34.8% 8 22 30 26.7% 2 10 12 16.7% 8 15 23 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Craybas Jana Nejedly
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1463 89.4 — — — — +32 — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — +0.21
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1468 119.4 — — — — +17 — — 28.6% -1.54 2–2 (50%) — — +0.14
21 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11 1995 1580 127.6 — — — — -12 — — 49.1% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.69
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1552 113.3 — — — — +10 — — 34.5% -1.14 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 95.3 -0.52
23 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19 1997 1541 109.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.12
24 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12 1998 1556 109.7 — — — — +2 -49 — 31.0% -1.31 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — -1.14
25 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 1999 1496 102.5 — — — — +42 -14 — 27.5% -1.72 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.67
26 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19 2000 1528 107.0 — — — — -2 -12 -40 36.5% -1.16 7–3 (70%) 3–4 (43%) 105.5 +0.89
27 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70 2001 1520 113.4 — — — — +22 -60 — 36.8% -0.88 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.7 +0.87
28 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02 2002 1423 84.2 — — — — +66 — — 23.3% -1.97 1–1 1–1 — +1.39
29 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80 — 1625 113.2 — — — — +15 -29 -40 34.0% -1.19 21–21 (50%) 8–15 (35%) 101.1 +1.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.