H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Justine Henin H2H: 0-2

Justine Henin holds a 2–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Justine Henin leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2010 Miami Open first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Justine Henin
BEL Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Justine Henin #33 6-2 6-2 Jill Craybas #90 Match data Mar 25, 2010* R128 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Justine Henin #8 6-0 6-4 Jill Craybas #102 Match data Sep 15, 2001* QF Waikoloa Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Justine Henin #13 #1 7,626 2,393 448 102 81.5% 7 1 10 2 18 5 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Justine Henin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 11–6 64.7% #69 1,655 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 2000 17–13 56.7% #45 1,749 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2001 56–18 75.7% #7 1,984 0 4
20 — — — — — — — 2002 50–21 70.4% #5 2,003 0 6
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 2003 73–11 86.9% #1 2,211 2 14
22 — — — — — — — 2004 36–4 90.0% #8 2,222 3 19
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 2005 34–5 87.2% #6 2,214 4 23
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2006 57–8 87.7% #1 2,287 5 29
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2007 63–4 94.0% #1 2,383 7 39
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2008 17–4 81.0% #1 2,287 7 41
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2010 32–7 82.1% #12 2,206 7 43
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1 2011 2–1 66.7% #13 2,181 7 43
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Craybas Justine Henin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 2 2 4 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 31 11 42 73.8% 14 4 18 77.8% 10 1 11 90.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 23 12 35 65.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 40 6 46 87.0% 20 1 21 95.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 32 2 34 94.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 10 4 14 71.4% 24 0 24 100.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 33 5 38 86.8% 14 2 16 87.5% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — —
25 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 38 1 39 97.4% 14 1 15 93.3% 9 1 10 90.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 16 3 19 84.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 16 4 20 80.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
29 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — 254 58 312 81.4% 122 21 143 85.3% 53 11 64 82.8% 19 12 31 61.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 212/350 of Jill Craybas's and 228/358 of Justine Henin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jill Craybas Justine Henin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 20/84 2.5 3.4 53.3% 73.0% 53.7% 58.7% 56.5% 63.9% 51.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 13/40 3.0 5.3 50.1% 69.4% 51.2% 59.1% 54.8% 60.1% 51.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 16/39 2.2 6.5 50.6% 71.0% 42.7% 61.1% 54.0% 56.9% 52.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 56/65 2.5 4.0 56.8% 71.5% 52.9% 51.3% 54.5% 63.4% 53.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 64/67 3.1 4.0 55.3% 72.7% 52.5% 57.6% 54.0% 63.7% 50.9%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 18/21 3.2 4.8 50.9% 69.9% 48.1% 63.5% 48.4% 59.0% 47.9%
28 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2% 2010 38/39 3.7 4.9 55.6% 71.7% 51.6% 54.2% 53.7% 62.9% 47.0%
29 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5% 2011 3/3 4.0 5.3 54.4% 72.4% 51.9% 63.3% 48.1% 63.3% 46.6%
30 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2% — 228/550 2.9 4.4 54.6% 71.7% 51.4% 56.4% 53.8% 62.5% 50.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Craybas Justine Henin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1655 135.1 — — — — -44 -20 — 64.1% +1.38 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.55
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1749 144.4 — — — — -25 -104 -162 59.1% +0.74 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -1.83
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1984 161.8 — — — — -70 -139 -32 73.7% +1.68 12–11 (52%) 8–9 (47%) 100.5 -2.53
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2004 159.7 — — — — -54 -47 +40 66.5% +1.01 11–9 (55%) 14–11 (56%) 98.9 -1.42
21 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11 2003 2211 171.2 +6.75 +6.21 1.432 57.6% -57 -5 -130 80.4% +2.15 16–4 (80%) 8–3 (73%) 110.8 -2.83
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2223 165.8 +3.52 +5.52 1.296 55.6% +14 -53 — 84.7% +2.27 5–2 (71%) 4–0 (100%) 104.0 -0.39
23 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19 2005 2215 154.4 +1.66 +6.12 1.214 54.5% -50 +146 — 75.6% +1.76 12–2 (86%) 5–1 (83%) 107.2 -1.31
24 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12 2006 2288 172.1 +7.32 +9.10 1.453 57.9% -24 +29 -105 83.9% +2.57 8–5 (62%) 6–2 (75%) 101.8 -3.18
25 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 2007 2384 173.7 +7.78 +7.96 1.402 56.9% +1 +34 -126 85.4% +2.48 14–3 (82%) 11–3 (79%) 107.3 -1.25
26 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19 2008 2287 147.8 +2.60 +2.75 1.166 53.4% +23 — — 71.7% +1.61 5–1 (83%) 0–4 (0%) 95.1 +0.11
27 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02 2010 2207 159.2 +6.24 +4.44 1.266 54.5% +37 +55 +20 76.3% +1.49 8–7 (53%) 7–3 (70%) 96.9 -1.91
29 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31 2011 2181 117.1 +2.80 +0.16 1.268 54.6% +36 — — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 0–1 — -0.01
30 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80 — 2394 169.9 +6.17 +6.72 1.351 56.2% -27 +4 -64 76.2% +1.83 97–54 (64%) 68–42 (62%) 107.0 -3.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.