H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jill Craybas vs Justine Henin H2H: 0-2
Justine Henin holds a 2–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Justine Henin leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2010 Miami first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2010* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-2 6-2 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
| Sep 15, 2001* | Waikoloa | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-0 6-4 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jill Craybas | Justine Henin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 |
| 23 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 |
| 24 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 |
| 26 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 |
| 27 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 |
| 30 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |