Jo Durie
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Sukova | 3 | 10 | 13 | Aug 14, 1992 | H2H |
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 8 | 5 | 13 | Jul 21, 1990 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 12 | 12 | Feb 2, 1991 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 2 | 9 | 11 | Aug 1, 1991 | H2H |
| Anne Hobbs | 4 | 5 | 9 | May 28, 1986 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Jo Durie vs Dana Gilbert H2H: 0-1
Dana Gilbert holds a 1–0 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dana Gilbert leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dana Gilbert won the 1982 Roland Garros round of 64 3-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
USA
Age 66
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dana Gilbert | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Jo Durie | Match data | May 27, 1982* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo Durie | #302 | #5 | 31 | 2,101 | 311 | 263 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| Dana Gilbert | — | — | — | 1,711 | 61 | 79 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jo Durie | Dana Gilbert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1976 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1977 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1978 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1980 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 3–13 | 18.8% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1981 | 30–14 | 68.2% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1982 | 25–20 | 55.6% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | #6 | 2,094 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1984 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #24 | 1,890 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #26 | 1,800 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #24 | 1,841 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #73 | 1,741 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,702 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #117 | 1,621 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,673 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,688 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #192 | 1,563 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #348 | 1,555 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,548 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jo Durie | Dana Gilbert | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | 1975 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1977 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 18 | 1979 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1978 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 0 | 6 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1979 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1981 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1980 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1982 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1981 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1983 | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 1982 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1984 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1983 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1985 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1987 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1989 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1993 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1994 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1995 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 73 | 75 | 148 | 49.3% | 57 | 45 | 102 | 55.9% | 103 | 72 | 175 | 58.9% | 50 | 65 | 115 | 43.5% | — | 25 | 33 | 58 | 43.1% | 35 | 33 | 68 | 51.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jo Durie | Dana Gilbert | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 1975 | 1499 | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | +0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1976 | 1503 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | +73 | — | +94 | 54.2% | +0.71 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | +3.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1977 | 1602 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | — | -35 | +40 | 56.1% | +0.71 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–1 | — | +2.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1978 | 1619 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | -9 | 57.4% | +0.50 | 5–1 (83%) | 1–2 (33%) | 104.3 | +2.99 | 1977 | 1509 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.42 |
| 18 | 1979 | 1714 | 129.5 | — | — | — | — | — | -76 | -94 | 58.5% | +0.36 | 6–1 (86%) | 6–2 (75%) | 110.0 | +0.87 | 1978 | 1616 | 120.2 | — | — | — | — | -30 | +61 | — | 58.6% | +0.21 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | 103.0 | +0.71 |
| 19 | 1980 | 1734 | 122.7 | — | — | — | — | -184 | -10 | -56 | 61.7% | +0.60 | 5–8 (38%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.6 | +0.68 | 1979 | 1556 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +140 | — | 22.2% | -2.20 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.65 |
| 20 | 1981 | 1859 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | -159 | -77 | -116 | 60.8% | +0.60 | 12–2 (86%) | 4–1 (80%) | 113.5 | -0.98 | 1980 | 1665 | 123.9 | — | — | — | — | -113 | +95 | — | 54.8% | +0.37 | 4–8 (33%) | 4–0 (100%) | 100.9 | +1.01 |
| 21 | 1982 | 1841 | 141.1 | — | — | — | — | -59 | -75 | -37 | 55.1% | +0.21 | 8–9 (47%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.4 | -2.62 | 1981 | 1612 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | -26 | +81 | — | 34.9% | -1.44 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–1 | — | +0.39 |
| 22 | 1983 | 2095 | 159.8 | — | — | — | — | -75 | -184 | -99 | 69.3% | +1.31 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–2 (60%) | 104.6 | -5.64 | 1982 | 1664 | 118.1 | — | — | — | — | -84 | +47 | — | 56.6% | +0.49 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–5 (44%) | 98.6 | +2.19 |
| 23 | 1984 | 1891 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -59 | +84 | 49.3% | +0.53 | 7–4 (64%) | 1–5 (17%) | 95.2 | +0.18 | 1983 | 1540 | 100.8 | — | — | — | — | +29 | +72 | — | 34.3% | -1.46 | 4–6 (40%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | +1.52 |
| 24 | 1985 | 1800 | 133.3 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -48 | +123 | 48.8% | +0.06 | 7–7 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | 96.7 | -1.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 1842 | 140.0 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -79 | +45 | 55.7% | +0.21 | 11–6 (65%) | 8–3 (73%) | 105.1 | -3.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1987 | 1741 | 134.1 | — | — | — | — | +30 | -30 | +108 | 41.0% | -0.69 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.3 | -2.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 1703 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -16 | +119 | 49.4% | -0.10 | 6–5 (55%) | 8–4 (67%) | 101.9 | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1989 | 1622 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | -8 | — | +201 | 41.3% | -0.67 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.1 | +0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 1674 | 130.7 | — | — | — | — | -60 | — | +193 | 51.7% | +0.48 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–5 (38%) | 93.4 | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 1709 | 132.3 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -111 | +94 | 45.5% | -0.12 | 6–7 (46%) | 1–2 (33%) | 100.5 | +1.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 1689 | 130.7 | — | — | — | — | -48 | -50 | +162 | 50.0% | -0.09 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.1 | +0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1993 | 1563 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | -11 | — | — | 35.9% | -0.74 | 3–6 (33%) | 0–4 (0%) | 92.1 | +1.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1994 | 1555 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +191 | 33.3% | -1.42 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1995 | 1548 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +141 | 40.0% | -0.60 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | -0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2101 | 141.6 | — | — | — | — | -26 | -67 | +43 | 53.6% | +0.27 | 97–90 (52%) | 53–46 (54%) | 102.6 | -0.68 | — | 1712 | 115.9 | — | — | — | — | -43 | +71 | — | 44.8% | -0.54 | 23–27 (46%) | 15–9 (63%) | 104.4 | +4.92 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Dana Gilbert
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Mascarin | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 1, 1983 | H2H |
| Pilar Vasquez | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 2, 1983 | H2H |
| Ivanna Madruga | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 12, 1983 | H2H |
| Barbara Jordan | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 14, 1982 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 6, 1982 | H2H |